Do Not Let Bofors Investigation Linger: Chitra Subramaniam (IANS Interview)
Click to start listening
Synopsis
Chitra Subramaniam emphasizes the ongoing need for a conclusive investigation into the Bofors scandal, highlighting that critical documents and witnesses remain unutilized. She expresses her willingness to mentor young journalists while calling for a collaborative approach to uncover the truth.
Key Takeaways
- Importance of ongoing investigation
- Mentoring young journalists
- Need for connecting with key sources
- Highlighting the emotional impact of the scandal
- Advocacy for confidence in the system
New Delhi, March 18 (NationPress) Nearly four decades after its onset, the investigation into the Bofors scandal remains unresolved, with significant documents and individuals available to shed light on the matter, yet they continue to be overlooked, asserts journalist Chitra Subramaniam.
"Indeed, there are both papers and people. Individuals are now more inclined to share information. Documents, on the other hand, are indisputable; money trails cannot fabricate truths. The CBI claims there are boxes... which boxes? I have only encountered one. The situation is perplexing," Subramaniam stated in an interview with IANS when asked if a renewed investigation is warranted.
"It's like experiencing a Rip Van Winkle moment post-publication. If you possess knowledge, please disclose it. Mr. Joginder Singh, a prominent figure, did not remain silent in the shadows. At the very least, share what you know," she remarked, referencing the former Central Bureau of Investigation director who received a substantial collection of Bofors-related financial documents in 1997.
"I believe there are documents and individuals who now feel more assured about coming forward," the seasoned journalist, whose latest book, 'Boforsgate: A Journalist’s Pursuit of Truth', details her decade-long investigation in Switzerland and Sweden to unveil the scandal's reality.
Nonetheless, Subramaniam expressed her reluctance to associate herself with a new investigation but is willing to mentor and guide younger journalists eager to delve into the topic.
"Kaa (her alias for a Switzerland-based Swedish arms dealer who provided her with insights into the morally ambiguous world of armament transactions) reached out to me recently... but I wish to distance myself from involvement. I've moved on... I would like the younger generation to step in if interested. I am more than willing to mentor and converse with aspiring journalists," she stated.
However, Subramaniam emphasized that any new investigation needs to "connect with the appropriate individuals."
"I am uncertain... we must engage with the right people. Can you believe that no one from India or any investigative agency has communicated with Sten Lindstrom, or Sting (the former Swedish police chief who was a crucial source for her)... Nobody. Does that make sense? (CBI chief in 1987) Mr. Mohan Katre visited Sweden but failed to meet him. Why not connect with him... he can guide you, saving both time and resources," she explained.
"This is his narrative as well. Why did he confide in me? It’s an emotional journey for him because the Social Democrats of Sweden disappointed him. Hence, there exists a profound story behind it all."
"Do I believe there should be an investigation? Absolutely, there needs to be one... but the parameters of that should be determined by my nation. It's not my role... As a journalist, I played my part; now, it's the government's responsibility to proceed... we can't let matters linger unresolved," Subramaniam conveyed to IANS.
Pointing out the "devastation of institutions, individuals, and relationships..." due to overt cover-ups during the initial Indian investigation following the scandal's emergence in 1987, she remarked: "My heart aches for the army... individuals in the military who are sacrificing their lives. We triumphed in the Kargil war due to that weaponry. However, I am informed that the erosion of morale is profound. Thus, we need to foster confidence—confidence in the system, confidence that asserts we are a democracy aspiring for greatness. I mention in my book, 'Provide us with a vision, equip us to aspire.'"
"Do not assert that 'is hamaam mein sab nange hai' (all are tainted)... that is inaccurate. Numerous individuals are not like that..."
When asked if she had foreseen the personal toll, frustrations, and inconclusive evidence she would encounter, she affirmed, "Yes."
"Certainly... but with modifications. I would ensure that childcare is prioritized, and I would approach home and childcare differently, but unequivocally, I would still proceed," she said.
She also offered a piece of advice to female journalists.
"I am eager to convey to all young women listening that there is no magical solution. You must navigate how to balance home and your career, as one will invariably influence the other... there exists no separation..." she concluded.
