Why is BRS Calling for an Apology from Telangana CM?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
Tension rises in Telangana as BRS demands an apology from Chief Minister Revanth Reddy over his agreement with Andhra Pradesh's Naidu on the controversial Godavari-Banakacherla project. The fallout raises questions about state rights and political loyalties.
Key Takeaways
- BRS demands accountability from Telangana’s leadership.
- Inter-state water rights are a contentious issue.
- KTR's strong remarks
- Public sentiment
- Regional governance
Hyderabad, July 16 (NationPress) The Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) has issued a formal demand for an apology from Telangana Chief Minister A. Revanth Reddy for his agreement with Andhra Pradesh's Chief Minister N. Chandrababu Naidu regarding the formation of a committee to discuss the proposed Godavari-Banakacherla link project.
In response to Chief Minister Revanth Reddy’s assertion that the Godavari-Banakacherla project was not a topic of discussion during the meeting of chief ministers convened by the Union Jal Shakti Ministry in Delhi, BRS leaders referred to statements made by Andhra Pradesh's water resources minister Nimmala Rama Naidu, indicating that a committee was indeed decided upon for the Banakacherla project and related matters.
BRS working president K. T. Rama Rao (KTR) expressed his thoughts on ‘X’, stating that the truth has become transparent and the masks have been removed.
Labeling Revanth Reddy as ‘anti-Telangana’, KTR accused him of misdirecting resources towards Rahul Gandhi and water allocations for Chandrababu Naidu.
KTR questioned whether Revanth Reddy's role as Chief Minister was merely to offer Godavari waters as ‘guru dakshina’ to his mentor, Chandrababu Naidu.
He further claimed that Revanth Reddy is jeopardizing the rights of Telangana’s 40 million citizens, stating, “It is evident who the true fighters for Telangana are.”
KTR warned that any illegal transfer of water to Andhra Pradesh would result in significant repercussions. “If outsiders deceive us, we will chase them away; if locals betray us, we will confront them here. We will not allow those harming Telangana to thrive,” he asserted.
BRS member and former irrigation minister T. Harish Rao reiterated the call for an apology from CM Revanth regarding the committee on Banakacherla.
He queried Revanth Reddy's attendance at the meeting that was reported to exclude Banakacherla from the agenda, seeking clarity on any covert agreements made overnight.
Harish Rao insisted that Banakacherla was the primary agenda item and accused Revanth Reddy of misleading the public during his post-meeting press conference.
He reminded CM Revanth that the electorate expected him to safeguard the state's interests rather than offer ‘guru dakshina’ to Chandrababu Naidu.
Harish Rao also alleged that Telangana is being influenced by the BJP and TDP through hidden mechanisms, pointing to comments from a Congress MLA suggesting the presence of TDP affiliates within Congress.
Point of View
We recognize the complexity surrounding inter-state agreements and the political dynamics at play. The demand for accountability from leaders reflects a broader concern for regional rights and governance. It is essential to approach this situation with a balanced perspective, promoting dialogue and understanding while safeguarding the interests of all citizens involved.
NationPress
16/07/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Godavari-Banakacherla link project?
The Godavari-Banakacherla link project is a proposed water resource initiative by Andhra Pradesh, aiming to connect the Godavari River to Banakacherla for irrigation and other purposes.
Why is BRS demanding an apology from the CM?
BRS is demanding an apology from CM Revanth Reddy for agreeing to the formation of a committee regarding the project, which they believe compromises Telangana’s water rights.
Who are the key political figures involved?
The key figures involved are Telangana CM A. Revanth Reddy, Andhra Pradesh CM N. Chandrababu Naidu, K. T. Rama Rao (KTR), and T. Harish Rao.
What are the implications of this political disagreement?
This disagreement highlights the larger issues of water rights, regional governance, and political accountability in Telangana and its relationship with Andhra Pradesh.
How is the public reacting to this situation?
Public reaction appears to be mixed, with some supporting BRS's stance on protecting Telangana’s interests, while others may view the political maneuvering as part of larger party politics.
