Calcutta HC: Justice Mantha's bench recuses from RG Kar rape-murder case

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Calcutta HC: Justice Mantha's bench recuses from RG Kar rape-murder case

Synopsis

Justice Rajasekhar Mantha's bench is the second Calcutta High Court bench to step away from the RG Kar rape-murder case, following Justice Basak's withdrawal in March 2025. With the victim's family still pressing questions about the CBI probe despite Sanjay Roy's conviction, the repeated judicial recusals are raising urgent questions about continuity and the pace of justice.

Key Takeaways

Justice Rajasekhar Mantha's bench at Calcutta High Court recused itself from the RG Kar rape-murder case on 12 May , citing a surplus of pending cases.
The West Bengal government is reportedly likely to form a judicial commission to address the case.
The CBI submitted a status report to the court, which was accepted; the agency was authorised to interrogate convict Sanjay Roy and other suspects.
In March 2025 , Justice Debangshu Basak's division bench had also withdrawn from the case on similar grounds.
Civic Volunteer Sanjay Roy was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment by Judge Anirban Das on 20 January 2025 .
The victim's family continues to pursue questions about the CBI investigation's completeness in the High Court.

Justice Rajasekhar Mantha's bench at the Calcutta High Court has recused itself from hearing the RG Kar Medical College and Hospital rape and murder case, citing a surplus of pending matters and the need for a bench that can dedicate adequate time to the proceedings. The development, reported on 12 May, marks the latest in a series of judicial transitions that have complicated the family's pursuit of justice since the incident in August 2024.

Why the Bench Stepped Back

Justice Mantha's bench noted that the volume of cases before it made it difficult to give the RG Kar matter the attention it warranted. In the interest of justice, the bench expressed the opinion that the case should be transferred to a bench capable of dedicating sufficient time. The West Bengal state government is reportedly likely to constitute a judicial commission to address aspects of the case.

Notably, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) had submitted a status report to the court, which was accepted. In a prior hearing, Justice Mantha's bench had stated that the CBI could interrogate Sanjay Roy — the convicted civic volunteer — and other suspects to advance the investigation.

A Pattern of Bench Changes

This is not the first time a bench has stepped away from the case. In March 2025, the division bench of Justice Debangshu Basak also withdrew, citing an inability to allocate time to the matter. The victim's family had sought an early hearing but was unable to secure a full hearing before that bench. Justice Basak's bench ultimately decided to leave the case on the same grounds of time constraints.

Earlier, the family had approached Justice Tirthankar Ghosh of the High Court, raising questions about the CBI's investigation. Justice Ghosh declined to hear the petition, noting that the RG Kar case was simultaneously being heard in the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court's Intervention

The victim's parents subsequently filed the same petition before the Supreme Court, where a hearing was held. However, the then Chief Justice of India, Sanjiv Khanna, questioned why the petition should be entertained at the apex court level and directed the matter back to the High Court. The case has been heard at the Calcutta High Court since that ruling.

Background: The RG Kar Case

The body of the female doctor was recovered on 9 August 2024 at RG Kar Medical College and Hospital in Kolkata. Civic Volunteer Sanjay Roy was arrested by the Kolkata Police the following day. The CBI subsequently took over the investigation on the orders of the Calcutta High Court. On 18 January 2025, the Sealdah court announced its verdict, finding Roy guilty. Judge Anirban Das sentenced him to life imprisonment on 20 January 2025.

Despite the conviction, the victim's family continues to press questions about the completeness of the CBI investigation through the courts. With Justice Mantha's bench now also stepping aside, the case will need to be assigned to yet another bench — raising concerns about continuity and the pace of proceedings.

Point of View

Multi-strand investigations are being bounced between benches, each citing time constraints. For the victim's family, every transition means re-establishing context and losing momentum. The CBI's status report remains sealed from public view, and the proposed judicial commission adds yet another layer of process without a clear timeline. Justice delayed through procedural attrition is still justice denied, and the RG Kar case is becoming a case study in exactly that.
NationPress
27 Jun 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did Justice Mantha's bench recuse itself from the RG Kar case?
Justice Rajasekhar Mantha's bench at the Calcutta High Court stepped back citing a surplus of pending cases and the need for a bench that could dedicate sufficient time to the RG Kar rape-murder matter. The bench expressed the view that justice would be better served by a court with adequate bandwidth for the case.
Who was convicted in the RG Kar rape and murder case?
Civic Volunteer Sanjay Roy was convicted in the RG Kar rape and murder case. Judge Anirban Das of the Sealdah court sentenced him to life imprisonment on 20 January 2025, after the court announced its verdict on 18 January 2025.
What is the current status of the CBI investigation into the RG Kar case?
The CBI has submitted a status report to the Calcutta High Court, which the court accepted. Justice Mantha's bench had previously authorised the CBI to interrogate Sanjay Roy and other suspects to take the investigation forward. The victim's family continues to raise questions about the completeness of the probe.
Is this the first time a Calcutta High Court bench has withdrawn from the RG Kar case?
No. In March 2025, the division bench of Justice Debangshu Basak also withdrew from hearing the case, citing an inability to allocate time to it. Justice Mantha's recusal is the latest in a series of such transitions.
What role did the Supreme Court play in the RG Kar case?
The victim's parents filed a petition in the Supreme Court after the Calcutta High Court declined to hear it. The then Chief Justice of India, Sanjiv Khanna, directed the matter back to the High Court, stating it should be heard there. The case has remained in the Calcutta High Court since that ruling.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 month ago
  2. 1 month ago
  3. 1 month ago
  4. 3 months ago
  5. 3 months ago
  6. 6 months ago
  7. 7 months ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google