New Petition Emerges at Calcutta High Court Regarding Transfer of 83 BDOs and 184 Police Inspectors
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Kolkata, March 30 (NationPress) A new petition has been submitted to a Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court on Monday concerning the Election Commission of India (ECI)’s directive issued on Sunday. This order involves the transfer of 83 Block Development Officers (BDOs), who also serve as Returning Officers, alongside 184 police officers ranked as Inspectors, who are tasked with overseeing various police stations across West Bengal.
Representing the petitioner, counsel Kalyan Banerjee, a veteran Trinamool Congress MP and seasoned advocate, requested expedited proceedings for this case.
The Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court, which includes Chief Justice Sujoy Paul and Justice Partha Sarathi Sen, has accepted the petition, and it is anticipated that the case will be reviewed this week.
This marks the second instance of a petition being presented to the Calcutta High Court regarding the transfers, replacements, and postings of bureaucrats and police personnel from West Bengal to other states as mandated by the ECI.
The initial Public Interest Litigation (PIL) pertained to the transfer of senior and mid-level bureaucrats and police officials from the state. The hearing for that PIL concluded last week, with a decision pending.
During discussions on the previous PIL, the ECI’s legal representative informed the court that the transfer of bureaucrats and police officers varies across states, influenced by the specific requirements on the ground.
The counsel further asserted that while the Commission does not possess limitless authority, it is empowered to make decisions to ensure a polling process that is free, fair, and devoid of violence.
“Multiple factors influence these decisions. Elections are ongoing in five states and Union Territories; conditions differ significantly. Officers have been reassigned in various locations. Actions are tailored to the local circumstances,” the ECI's counsel stated last week.
Conversely, the petitioner’s counsel accused the ECI of exerting undue control over bureaucrats and police officers from the outset of the Special Intensive Revision in the state, even prior to the enforcement of the Model Code of Conduct.
The petitioner’s counsel also challenged the ECI's authority to transfer, replace, and assign any bureaucrat or police officer at its discretion.