Legal Challenge in Calcutta HC Against ECI’s Transfers of Bureaucrats in Polls
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Kolkata, March 20 (NationPress) A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has been submitted to the Calcutta High Court contesting the transfers of West Bengal cadre bureaucrats and police officials mandated by the Election Commission of India (ECI) following the activation of the Model Code of Conduct this past Sunday.
This PIL was presented to a Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court in anticipation of the significant two-phase Assembly elections scheduled for next month.
Representing the petitioner, Arka Nag, the PIL was filed by senior advocate and four-time Trinamool Congress Lok Sabha member, Kalyan Banerjee.
In his submission to the Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Sujoy Paul and Justice Partha Sarathi Sen, Banerjee raised specific concerns regarding the transfers of key figures within both the general and police administration, including the chief secretary, state home secretary, state director general of police, additional director general (law & order), and the commissioner of Kolkata Police, among others.
The petitioner questioned the Election Commission's jurisdiction over such extensive transfers across the hierarchy of the general and police administration, particularly affecting the highest-ranking officials.
In addition to the transfers, the ECI has also assigned some bureaucrats and police officers, including the former state home secretary, Jagdish Prasad Meena, as central observers to other states preparing for elections.
The petitioner contended that these sweeping transfers of top bureaucrats and police personnel are unique to West Bengal, absent in other states and Union Territories preparing for elections.
West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has sent two successive letters this week to Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, opposing the transfers of bureaucrats and police officials.
In her most recent correspondence on Thursday evening, the Chief Minister accused the Commission of unlawfully undermining the authority of the elected state government, asserting that such biased, hasty, and unilateral actions are unprecedented and detrimental to a healthy democracy.