Did the Calcutta High Court Just Restrict Firecracker Use on Shab-e-Barat?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Kolkata, Feb 2 (NationPress) The Calcutta High Court has passed a directive aimed at regulating the use of firecrackers during the night of Shab-e-Barat. This decision was made by a Division Bench led by Chief Justice Sujoy Paul and Justice Partha Sarathi Sen on Monday, according to court sources.
As per the ruling, firecrackers are prohibited from being ignited from 10 PM on the night of Shab-e-Barat until 6 AM the following day. The use of firecrackers is mandated to adhere to the regulations set forth by the West Bengal Pollution Control Board. In case of non-compliance, law enforcement is authorized to take necessary actions against violators.
The date for Shab-e-Barat falls on February 4. It has been reported that during this occasion, as well as in the days leading up to and following it, there is rampant use of loud firecrackers across different regions of Kolkata, with little to no regulation in place. There are claims that firecrackers are set off continuously throughout the night.
The petitioner argued that the Holy Quran does not advocate for the celebration of Shab-e-Barat through the use of firecrackers. Additionally, the police have previously managed firecracker usage during Kali Puja, Christmas, and Chhath Puja in the state, allowing only environmentally friendly fireworks at designated times.
The High Court has provided clear guidelines on this matter. However, due to the absence of a specific court order regarding Shab-e-Barat, the uncontrolled firing of loud firecrackers throughout the night has been reported.
The petitioner, Shagufta Suleman, submitted a Public Interest Litigation requesting the court's intervention. Upon reviewing the petition, the court has mandated that no firecrackers should be ignited post 10 PM.
According to the petitioner, last year, despite a similar order from the then Chief Justice T.S. Sivagnanam of the Calcutta High Court, firecrackers were extensively ignited in areas like Park Street and Ripon Street, blatantly disregarding the court's directive. Consequently, this led to considerable distress for the sick, elderly, children, and pets.