Rajasthan Lok Adalat awards ₹23.36 lakh to woman given chemo for TB

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Rajasthan Lok Adalat awards ₹23.36 lakh to woman given chemo for TB

Synopsis

A Jaipur woman received chemotherapy for cancer she never had — her actual illness was tuberculosis, confirmed only after her family sought a second opinion at Tata Memorial Hospital. The Permanent Lok Adalat has now ordered ₹23.36 lakh in compensation, in a case that exposes the dangers of starting aggressive treatment without a confirmatory diagnosis.

Key Takeaways

Permanent Lok Adalat, Jaipur ordered ₹23,36,774 compensation on 24 August in a medical negligence case.
Lakshmi Sharma of Bharatpur was allegedly given chemotherapy for suspected cancer without a confirmatory test; she was later found to have tuberculosis .
Correct diagnosis was established at Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai in January 2023 and confirmed at Shri Braj Seva Samiti TB Hospital, Vrindavan .
Award includes ₹20 lakh for mental and physical suffering and ₹3,36,774 for documented medical expenses; the larger expense claim was rejected for lack of evidence.
Lakshmi had originally sought ₹95 lakh ; the hospital denied negligence, citing a payment of only ₹29,750 .

The Permanent Lok Adalat in Jaipur has ordered ₹23,36,774 in compensation to Lakshmi Sharma, a resident of Bharatpur, who was allegedly subjected to multiple rounds of chemotherapy for suspected cancer — only for later tests to confirm she was suffering from tuberculosis (TB). The ruling, delivered on 24 August, marks a significant finding of medical negligence against a Jaipur cancer hospital.

How the Misdiagnosis Unfolded

Lakshmi Sharma of Pushp Vatika Colony, Bharatpur, first visited Bhagwan Mahaveer Cancer Hospital in Jaipur in October 2022 with abdominal pain and related health complaints. She was directed to undergo diagnostic tests at a separate centre. According to the Lok Adalat's findings, when those reports raised suspicion of cancer, treatment was reportedly initiated without a confirmatory diagnostic test being conducted.

Lakshmi subsequently underwent repeated chemotherapy cycles, yet her condition showed no improvement. Her family grew alarmed and, in January 2023, took her to Tata Memorial Hospital in Mumbai, where physicians determined she had tuberculosis — not cancer. The diagnosis was independently confirmed at Shri Braj Seva Samiti Tuberculosis Hospital in Vrindavan. Once placed on standard TB treatment, her health reportedly improved.

What the Lok Adalat Found

The order was passed by Presiding Officer Gambhir Singh, along with members Yogesh Kumar Sharma and Rajnikant Sharma. The bench observed that the incorrect diagnosis had subjected Lakshmi to unnecessary and severe treatment, resulting in significant physical suffering, mental anguish, and financial hardship.

Advocate Rajesh Pachauri, who represented Lakshmi, said she had originally sought ₹95 lakh in total compensation — comprising ₹15 lakh for medical expenses, ₹80 lakh for mental, physical, and financial losses, and ₹21,000 towards litigation costs.

Compensation Awarded and What Was Rejected

The hospital and the treating doctors denied negligence, contending that only ₹29,750 had been paid to the hospital. The Lok Adalat, however, awarded a total of ₹23,36,774 — broken down as ₹20 lakh for mental anguish, physical suffering, and financial loss, and ₹3,36,774 towards medical expenses backed by documentary evidence.

The larger medical-expense claim was rejected on account of insufficient documentary proof. The gap between the ₹95 lakh sought and the ₹23.36 lakh awarded reflects the tribunal's insistence on evidence-based quantification of harm.

Broader Significance

This case highlights a recurring concern in oncology care: the risk of initiating aggressive treatment before a definitive histopathological or microbiological diagnosis is established. TB and certain cancers can present with overlapping symptoms, making confirmatory testing critical before commencing chemotherapy. Notably, this is not an isolated instance — medical bodies have previously flagged misdiagnosis between TB and malignancy as a patient-safety gap in India's healthcare system.

The ruling is expected to bring Lakshmi Sharma a measure of relief after nearly two years of unnecessary treatment and distress. Whether the hospital will challenge the order in a higher forum remains to be seen.

Point of View

But the ₹23.36 lakh award, while meaningful, is a fraction of the ₹95 lakh sought and arguably does not fully price the harm of months of unnecessary toxic treatment. The deeper question the medical establishment must answer is whether existing protocols for mandatory confirmatory testing before chemotherapy are being enforced — and if not, why not.
NationPress
30 Aug 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened in the Rajasthan Lok Adalat medical negligence case?
The Permanent Lok Adalat in Jaipur awarded ₹23,36,774 to Lakshmi Sharma, a Bharatpur resident who was allegedly given chemotherapy for suspected cancer without a confirmatory test, only to be diagnosed later with tuberculosis. The order was passed on 24 August by Presiding Officer Gambhir Singh.
Which hospital was held responsible in this case?
Bhagwan Mahaveer Cancer Hospital in Jaipur was the subject of the complaint. The hospital and its doctors denied negligence, stating only ₹29,750 had been paid to the hospital, but the Lok Adalat ruled in favour of the patient.
How was the correct diagnosis of tuberculosis established?
Lakshmi Sharma's family took her to Tata Memorial Hospital in Mumbai in January 2023, where tests revealed she had tuberculosis and not cancer. The diagnosis was subsequently confirmed at Shri Braj Seva Samiti Tuberculosis Hospital in Vrindavan, after which she was placed on TB treatment and reportedly recovered.
How much compensation was awarded and what was rejected?
The Lok Adalat awarded ₹23,36,774 — comprising ₹20 lakh for mental anguish and physical suffering, and ₹3,36,774 for medical expenses supported by bills. The larger medical-expense claim, part of a total ₹95 lakh sought, was rejected due to insufficient documentary evidence.
Why does this case matter for patients in India?
It highlights the risk of initiating aggressive cancer treatment before a definitive diagnosis is confirmed, particularly given the overlapping symptoms of tuberculosis and certain malignancies. The ruling underscores patients' right to seek compensation when diagnostic protocols are not followed.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 2 weeks ago
  2. 1 month ago
  3. 1 month ago
  4. 3 months ago
  5. 8 months ago
  6. 1 year ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google