Why Did Chirag Paswan Criticise Trinamool for Boycotting the All-Party Delegation on Terrorism?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
Union Minister Chirag Paswan's sharp criticism of Trinamool Congress for boycotting an all-party delegation highlights the need for political unity in addressing terrorism. This article explores the implications of political decisions on national security and international diplomacy.
Key Takeaways
- Chirag Paswan emphasizes political unity on national issues.
- The Trinamool Congress's withdrawal from the delegation has sparked debate.
- International representation is crucial for addressing terrorism.
- Political insecurity can influence representation decisions.
- Trade parity discussions continue to be relevant amidst these political dynamics.
Patna, May 19 (NationPress) Union Minister and LJP (Ram Vilas) leader Chirag Paswan on Monday vehemently condemned the Trinamool Congress for its decision to boycott an all-party delegation focused on terrorism, emphasizing the necessity for political unity on international stages.
"Politics should not interfere with critical issues. While representing our nation on a global scale, personal differences and controversies must be set aside. Such actions do not serve our national interest," Paswan remarked.
He stressed that political disputes ought not to hinder matters related to national security and international diplomacy.
Paswan's comments followed the Trinamool Congress (TMC) officially withdrawing from an all-party delegation that aimed to highlight Pakistan-sponsored terrorism in various countries. The party informed the Centre that neither Yusuf Pathan, a TMC MP, nor any other representative would join the international mission.
This decision has sparked reactions from various political factions, with numerous NDA leaders criticizing the move.
Sources indicate that Yusuf Pathan has notified the Central government about his unavailability for the international tour.
In the meantime, BJP MP Sanjay Jaiswal suggested that the withdrawal of Yusuf Pathan was influenced by political insecurity within the Trinamool.
"Yusuf is an established international cricketer. Mamata Banerjee feels uneasy when someone else gains popularity. That’s why Yusuf Pathan's name was dropped," he asserted.
Jaiswal also addressed India’s recent prohibition on the import of plastic and ready-made garments from Bangladesh, supporting it as a move towards trade parity.
"If you’re collecting taxes from India, you must pay the same to India. The ban is warranted," he stated.
Jaiswal further emphasized the developmental progress in Bihar under Chief Minister Nitish Kumar, claiming that the NDA's increasing popularity stems from its performance.
Point of View
It is crucial to view Chirag Paswan's remarks as a call for unity in addressing pressing issues like terrorism. Political divisions should not overshadow the greater national interest, particularly in international forums. It is essential for all parties to collaborate for the security and stability of the nation.
NationPress
08/06/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What prompted Chirag Paswan's criticism of the Trinamool Congress?
Chirag Paswan criticized the Trinamool Congress for boycotting an all-party delegation on terrorism, emphasizing the need for political unity on global platforms.
What was the Trinamool Congress's stance on the all-party delegation?
The Trinamool Congress officially withdrew from the delegation, stating that neither Yusuf Pathan nor any other party representative would participate.
What are the implications of such a boycott on national security?
Boycotting international discussions on terrorism can undermine national security efforts and weaken India's stance against threats like Pakistan-sponsored terrorism.
Who else commented on the situation?
BJP MP Sanjay Jaiswal suggested the withdrawal was due to political insecurity within the Trinamool Congress, particularly concerning the popularity of Yusuf Pathan.
What was discussed regarding trade with Bangladesh?
Jaiswal supported India's recent ban on imports from Bangladesh, framing it as a necessary step towards achieving trade parity.
