Did CJI Gavai Misrepresent His Views on the Reconstruction of a Beheaded Lord Vishnu Idol?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
Chief Justice BR Gavai's comments during a PIL concerning a beheaded Lord Vishnu idol have stirred controversy on social media. He clarified that his remarks were misrepresented. The PIL highlights the neglect of temples in Khajuraho. Explore the implications of these statements and their reception in the public sphere.
Key Takeaways
- CJI Gavai clarified his comments regarding Lord Vishnu's idol.
- The PIL addresses the neglect of Khajuraho temples.
- Social media can amplify misunderstandings.
- Legal experts weighed in on the challenges of public discourse.
- Respect for all religions remains a core value.
New Delhi, Sep 18 (NationPress) Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gavai clarified on Thursday that his comments made during the hearing of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) regarding the restoration of a 7-foot beheaded idol of Lord Vishnu at the Javari Temple in Khajuraho were being misrepresented on social media. "Someone mentioned to me that my comments have been mischaracterized on social platforms. I have respect for all religions," stated CJI Gavai.
Although the Supreme Court chose not to entertain the PIL, CJI Gavai had reportedly suggested to the litigant, "Go and ask the deity himself to take action," and added, "So, go and pray now."
His comments ignited a discussion online, with many labeling them as lacking sensitivity and disrespectful to the beliefs of countless devotees of Lord Vishnu.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, the second-ranking law officer of the Center, noted that discussions often get exaggerated on social media.
"We knew Newton's Law - every action produces an equal reaction, but now every action triggers a disproportionate response on social media," he remarked.
Similarly, senior advocate Kapil Sibal, present in the courtroom, mentioned, "We face this daily. Social media is an untamed beast, and there’s no controlling it!"
The PIL, initiated by Rakesh Dalal, National President of the National Veer Kisan Majdoor Dal, emphasized the longstanding neglect of temples within the UNESCO World Heritage-listed Khajuraho complex by both the Union and Madhya Pradesh governments, despite numerous appeals. "The temples of Khajuraho, built by the Chandravanshi kings, also acted as a ‘Paathshaala’ in ancient times. However, despite 77 years since independence, the authorities have failed to act for their development and restoration, denying the people their fundamental right to worship," noted the PIL submitted through Nuli & Nuli.
Point of View
We recognize the importance of clarity and respect when discussing sensitive issues such as religious beliefs. CJI Gavai’s comments reflect a broader challenge in navigating public discourse in the age of social media. It is crucial to approach such matters with empathy and understanding.
NationPress
20/09/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What did CJI Gavai say about the idol's reconstruction?
CJI Gavai clarified that his comments regarding the beheaded Lord Vishnu idol were misrepresented on social media.
What sparked the controversy?
His remarks suggesting that the litigant should pray to the deity were seen as insensitive by many on social media.
Who filed the PIL?
The PIL was filed by Rakesh Dalal, the National President of the National Veer Kisan Majdoor Dal.
What was the main concern of the PIL?
The PIL highlighted the neglect of temples in the UNESCO World Heritage-listed Khajuraho complex by the government.
What did other legal experts say about social media reactions?
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta noted that social media often exaggerates reactions, while senior advocate Kapil Sibal called it an 'unruly horse.'
