CM Himanta Vows Secular Anti-Encroachment Drive in Assam
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Regardless of religion, no encroacher is safe in Assam — that is the blunt message Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma delivered on Monday, 9 November 2026, doubling down on the state's ongoing eviction operations and rejecting accusations of selective enforcement.
Posting on X, Sarma stated in Hindi: 'असम में अतिक्रमणकारियों के खिलाफ कठोर कदम उठाए जा रहे हैं और आगे भी उठाए जाते रहेंगे, चाहे अतिक्रमणकारी किसी भी धर्म का हो।' ('Strict action is being and will continue to be taken against encroachers in Assam, regardless of which religion an encroacher belongs to.') He added that the crackdown is 'completely secular' and that no discrimination is made on the basis of religion.
A Long-Running Land Reclamation Campaign
Assam has grappled for decades with unauthorised occupation of government, forest, and tribal land — a problem successive administrations have linked to both domestic migration and cross-border immigration pressures. Under Sarma's leadership since 2021, the state government has conducted multiple eviction drives, with notable large-scale operations reported through 2022–2023, targeting encroachments across river-bank areas, reserve forests, and revenue land. The drives have reclaimed thousands of hectares for the state.
Proponents frame the operations as essential to protecting indigenous Assamese communities and their land rights. Critics — including opposition parties and civil society groups — have at various points alleged that enforcement falls disproportionately on Muslim-majority settlements, an allegation the Sarma government has consistently denied. Monday's post is a direct, public answer to that charge.
Why the 'Secular' Framing Matters Now
The Chief Minister's choice to use the word dharmnirpeksh — secular — is deliberate political signalling. By asserting that action has been and will be taken against encroachers 'of any religion', Sarma is simultaneously defending the legal legitimacy of the drives and pre-empting further opposition attacks ahead of what the government has signalled will be continued operations.
The broader pattern across northeastern governance has seen land reclamation become a defining political issue — tied not just to law enforcement, but to identity, demographic anxiety, and the rights of indigenous communities. Sarma, as convenor of the North-East Democratic Alliance (NEDA), has staked significant political capital on projecting a firm, non-partisan image on encroachment. His post draws a clear line: the law applies uniformly, and the operations will not stop.
Opposition parties and community organisations are likely to contest that characterisation, and related court petitions on eviction procedures remain an ongoing legal dimension. The government's next operational phase will be the real test of whether that secular framing holds up on the ground.