CM Sukhu launches village CBSE schools at Rs 2,000, targets BJP land deal
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Two thousand rupees versus one lakh — that is the gap Himachal Pradesh Chief Minister Sukhvinder Singh Sukhu says his government is closing for rural children shut out of quality education. Speaking on Friday, 25 September 2026, Sukhu announced the rollout of government-run CBSE-affiliated schools in villages across Himachal Pradesh, charging families just Rs 2,000 per year against the roughly Rs 1 lakh annual cost at private CBSE institutions.
The Rs 2,000 classroom — and what it replaces
Sukhu traced the origin of the initiative directly to a gap left by his predecessor. He stated that during the tenure of former Chief Minister Jairam Thakur of the Bharatiya Janata Party — who led Himachal Pradesh from 2017 to 2022 — schools in rural areas were shut down under a rationalization drive. The Congress government's response, he said, was not to reopen the old institutions but to replace them with something better: CBSE-standard schools staffed with qualified teachers, accessible at a fraction of private-school costs.
The contrast Sukhu draws is deliberate and sharp. Private CBSE schools are largely concentrated in urban centres, placing them financially and geographically beyond most village families. A government CBSE school at Rs 2,000 — equivalent to roughly the cost of two textbooks — repositions the state as the equaliser between Shimla's urban middle class and a farming family in a remote panchayat.
The Baddi-Nalagarh land allegation — Rs 10,000 crore sold for Rs 1 crore
The education announcement was not the only charge Sukhu levelled. He pivoted sharply to an industrial land deal, asking citizens — and BJP legislators specifically — to explain why 5,000 bighas of land in Baddi-Nalagarh, valued at Rs 10,000 crore, was allegedly transferred for just Rs 1 crore under the cover of a 'customised package' during the previous administration.
Baddi-Nalagarh, in Solan district, is Himachal Pradesh's most significant industrial corridor, home to hundreds of pharmaceutical and manufacturing units. Land in this belt commands premium valuations precisely because of the infrastructure and regulatory environment built up over decades. Sukhu's allegation — if substantiated — would imply a write-down of more than 99 percent of market value on a state-owned asset. The claim has not been independently verified, and no official inquiry has been announced as of this writing.
The charge fits a recurring pattern in HP politics: industrial 'customised packages,' which allow the state to offer bespoke incentives to large investors, have periodically drawn scrutiny over whether concessions crossed the line from competitive inducement to asset giveaway.
Congress's twin-track pitch for 2026
Taken together, the two announcements — one a welfare delivery, one an opposition indictment — sketch the Congress government's political strategy clearly. Sukhu is simultaneously building a record of rural-inclusive governance and constructing a counter-narrative against the BJP ahead of any electoral reckoning. The education initiative gives him something tangible to point to in villages; the Baddi-Nalagarh allegation gives the opposition something to answer.
Whether BJP legislators respond to the land-deal challenge, and whether independent scrutiny follows, will determine whether this remains a political talking point or becomes a full accountability moment. For the village children enrolling in those new CBSE classrooms, the politics may matter far less than whether the teachers actually show up.