CM Vishnu Deo Sai hits Congress over EVM double standard
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Every time the votes are counted, the same script plays out — and Chhattisgarh Chief Minister Vishnu Deo Sai is calling it out. On Friday, 30 October 2026, the senior BJP leader posted a pointed challenge on X, targeting the Congress party's selective faith in India's election machinery.
Sai's post — in Hindi — translates directly: 'Congress blames EVMs and the Election Commission for its losses, but whenever the same Congress wins somewhere, everything suddenly becomes fine. Why this double standard?' The question is short. The political charge behind it is not.
The EVM credibility argument — a recurring opposition refrain
The Electronic Voting Machine has been a flashpoint in Indian electoral politics since it became universal in the early 2000s. After the 2014 Lok Sabha results reshaped the national landscape, the pattern became almost predictable: parties that lost pointed at the machines, parties that won defended them. The Congress, as the principal national opposition, has been at the centre of this argument more than once — raising doubts after defeats in Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, and Chhattisgarh itself, while simultaneously claiming victories in states like Karnataka and Telangana without contest.
The Election Commission of India, a constitutionally independent body, has consistently defended EVM integrity, citing end-to-end encryption, tamper-proof hardware, and a sealed manufacturing chain. The Supreme Court has also periodically examined EVM-VVPAT verification petitions, each time declining to mandate a full paper-count.
Why Sai's jab lands differently from Raipur
Sai is not a casual commentator — he is the sitting Chief Minister of a state that Congress governed for fifteen years before the BJP's decisive return in 2023. His credibility on Chhattisgarh's electoral history is direct. When he frames the EVM argument as hypocrisy, he is speaking from a state where both parties have won and lost on the same machines.
The broader BJP line has long been that the EVM narrative is a coping mechanism, activated selectively and conveniently. Sai's post distils that argument into a single, rhetorically efficient question — a format designed for maximum reach on social media rather than a formal policy statement.
With assembly elections scheduled in several states and ongoing Supreme Court scrutiny of VVPAT verification protocols, the EVM debate is far from archived. Every electoral cycle re-arms both sides — and posts like this one signal that the 2026-27 election season will be no different. The machines will keep counting; the argument will keep running.