Delhi court bars coercive action against Congress MP Akoijam in JNU harassment case
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
A Delhi court on Thursday, 5 November 2026, restrained the Delhi Police from taking coercive action against Congress MP Angomcha Bimol Akoijam in connection with sexual harassment allegations levelled by 11 female students of Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), directing the police to serve him a written notice at least seven days in advance before any arrest. The order was passed by the Rouse Avenue Court while disposing of Akoijam's anticipatory bail plea.
What the Court Ordered
The Rouse Avenue Court disposed of the anticipatory bail application after the Delhi Police informed it that the Inner Manipur Lok Sabha MP was cooperating with the ongoing investigation. The police also assured the court that he would be given adequate advance notice before any custodial action.
The court directed the investigating agency to personally serve any such notice on Akoijam in writing a minimum of seven days before taking him into custody. Additionally, the court directed the MP to furnish the contact numbers of two family members to the investigating officer so that notices could be delivered in a timely manner.
The court made clear that the Delhi Police would be at liberty to approach it if Akoijam failed to cooperate with the probe. It also directed the police to complete the investigation and file the chargesheet in the case.
Background: Dismissal from JNU and High Court Relief
The developments at the trial court level come days after the Delhi High Court granted interim relief to Akoijam by staying the operation of JNU's order dismissing him from service. A single-judge Bench of Justice Anup J. Bhambhani passed the interim order on 2 November while hearing his writ petition challenging the dismissal.
According to JNU's order dated 9 October, Vice-Chancellor Santishree D. Pandit had ordered Akoijam's dismissal from service with immediate effect, following an inquiry conducted by the university's Internal Complaints Committee (ICC). The university stated that disciplinary action was taken on the basis of the ICC's findings and after following due process under applicable service rules.
The High Court also issued notice to JNU and listed the matter for further hearing in January.
The Complaints and Police Investigation
The complaints against Akoijam were submitted by 11 female students of JNU in May this year. The Congress MP subsequently appeared before the Delhi Police at the Vasant Kunj North police station on 15 October in response to a summons to join the investigation.
Describing the developments as a 'political matter', Akoijam said he had appeared to cooperate with the investigation and did not want his absence to be construed as a lack of cooperation with the authorities. He thereafter approached the Rouse Avenue Court seeking anticipatory bail.
What Happens Next
With both the trial court and the Delhi High Court having granted interim protections, attention now shifts to the police completing its investigation and filing the chargesheet, as well as the High Court's January hearing on Akoijam's challenge to his JNU dismissal. The case carries significant implications for the ongoing national discourse around institutional accountability and due process in sexual harassment proceedings involving public figures.