Congress moves Supreme Court over Meenakshi Natarajan's RS nomination rejection

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Congress moves Supreme Court over Meenakshi Natarajan's RS nomination rejection

Synopsis

Congress's sole Rajya Sabha candidate from Madhya Pradesh has had her nomination cancelled over an allegedly undisclosed Telangana case — a charge she calls a 'political conspiracy'. With the party now knocking on the Supreme Court's door for urgent relief, the dispute has turned a routine nomination round into a flashpoint over institutional neutrality.

Key Takeaways

Congress has moved the Supreme Court seeking urgent hearing on 12 June over the rejection of Meenakshi Natarajan 's Rajya Sabha nomination from Madhya Pradesh .
The Returning Officer cancelled Natarajan's papers after BJP alleged she concealed a pending case in a Telangana court from her nomination affidavit.
The Telangana case involves former corporate executive A.
Srilatha , who has petitioned the Fourth Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate's Court in Hyderabad with allegations against Kumbham Shivakumar Reddy , claiming Natarajan provided him political patronage.
Natarajan has called the allegations a 'political conspiracy' and accused Returning Officers of being 'compromised' and acting on behalf of the ruling government.
Natarajan was Congress's only Rajya Sabha candidate from Madhya Pradesh in this election cycle.

The Indian National Congress has approached the Supreme Court to challenge the rejection of its Rajya Sabha candidate Meenakshi Natarajan's nomination from Madhya Pradesh, seeking an urgent hearing before the court's vacation bench on Thursday, 12 June. The legal challenge comes a day after the Returning Officer cancelled Natarajan's papers following objections raised by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).

Why the Nomination Was Rejected

The Returning Officer rejected Natarajan's nomination papers on the grounds that she had allegedly failed to disclose a pending legal case in Telangana in her nomination affidavit. The BJP had formally raised this objection, making it the basis for the cancellation.

According to the objection filed, former corporate executive A. Srilatha has petitioned the Fourth Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate's Court in Hyderabad, alleging that Natarajan provided political patronage to one Kumbham Shivakumar Reddy. Srilatha has levelled serious allegations against Reddy, including molestation and death threats. Natarajan's nomination was the Congress party's sole Rajya Sabha candidacy from Madhya Pradesh in this round.

Natarajan Calls It a 'Political Conspiracy'

Natarajan has categorically rejected the allegations, describing them as a 'political conspiracy' aimed at maligning her reputation. She has also opposed Srilatha's petition before a Hyderabad court, contesting its basis and intent.

On Wednesday, Natarajan alleged that the Returning Officers were 'compromised' and acting at the behest of the ruling government. 'We are in a battlefield where Congress leaders are not only fighting against an opposition party. Unfortunately, the institutions that our constitutional forefathers created are now being disrespected, and they appear to be influenced in a way that makes us feel we are also fighting against them,' she said.

She further stated: 'How can one not know how to fill a form? There is nothing legal or technical in this. This is just a political malintent which we saw at every step yesterday, how efforts were being made to subvert democracy.'

Sharp Attack on Returning Officers

Natarajan reserved her sharpest criticism for the officials who oversaw the nomination process. 'I will say this with full responsibility that the returning officers yesterday were compromised. They were working as spokespersons and as the frontal organisation heads of the current government,' she said.

This comes amid a broader pattern of opposition parties raising concerns about the neutrality of election-related officials during nomination proceedings. Notably, allegations of institutional bias during nomination rounds have surfaced in multiple states in recent election cycles.

What Happens Next

With Congress seeking urgent relief from the Supreme Court's vacation bench, the outcome of Thursday's hearing could determine whether Natarajan's candidacy is revived ahead of the Rajya Sabha election schedule. If the court declines to intervene, Congress will be left without a candidate from Madhya Pradesh in this cycle. Legal observers note that courts have previously granted interim relief in nomination-related disputes, though the bar for urgent intervention remains high.

Point of View

Combined with the speed of the Returning Officer's decision, will inevitably invite scrutiny. The deeper question is structural: India's nomination-scrutiny process gives Returning Officers significant discretionary power, and that power has historically been contested when it intersects with electoral competition. If the Supreme Court admits the matter, it will not just be ruling on one candidate — it will be signalling how much judicial oversight applies to nomination-stage decisions, a question with consequences well beyond Madhya Pradesh.
NationPress
26 Jul 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Why was Meenakshi Natarajan's Rajya Sabha nomination rejected?
The Returning Officer rejected Natarajan's nomination papers after the BJP alleged she had failed to disclose a pending court case in Telangana in her nomination affidavit. The case involves a petition filed by former corporate executive A. Srilatha before the Fourth Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate's Court in Hyderabad.
What has Congress done in response to the rejection?
Congress has moved the Supreme Court challenging the rejection and is seeking an urgent hearing before the court's vacation bench on 12 June. The party argues the cancellation was politically motivated.
What does Meenakshi Natarajan say about the allegations?
Natarajan has dismissed the allegations as a 'political conspiracy' aimed at damaging her reputation. She has also accused the Returning Officers of being 'compromised' and of acting as spokespersons for the ruling government rather than as neutral officials.
Who is A. Srilatha and what is the Telangana case about?
A. Srilatha is a former corporate executive who has petitioned a Hyderabad magistrate's court alleging that Natarajan provided political patronage to Kumbham Shivakumar Reddy, against whom Srilatha has levelled allegations including molestation and death threats. Natarajan has opposed this petition in court.
What is at stake for Congress in Madhya Pradesh's Rajya Sabha seat?
Natarajan was Congress's sole Rajya Sabha candidate from Madhya Pradesh in this election cycle. If the Supreme Court does not intervene, the party will be left without a candidate from the state in this round of elections.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 month ago
  2. 1 month ago
  3. 1 month ago
  4. 1 month ago
  5. 1 month ago
  6. 1 month ago
  7. 1 month ago
  8. 1 month ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google