Meenakshi Natarajan alleges Returning Officers were 'compromised' after RS nomination cancelled

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Meenakshi Natarajan alleges Returning Officers were 'compromised' after RS nomination cancelled

Synopsis

Congress’s lone Rajya Sabha candidate from Madhya Pradesh has been knocked off the ballot — and she is not going quietly. Meenakshi Natarajan’s charge that Returning Officers were ‘compromised’ and acting as government proxies turns a procedural nomination dispute into a direct assault on electoral institution credibility, with the Election Commission now in the crosshairs.

Key Takeaways

Meenakshi Natarajan’s Rajya Sabha nomination from Madhya Pradesh was cancelled after a BJP objection over an alleged undisclosed court case in Telangana .
Natarajan alleged that Returning Officers were “compromised” and functioning as agents of the ruling government.
The objection was filed by former corporate executive A.
Srilatha , alleging Natarajan gave political patronage to Kumbham Shivakumar Reddy , accused of molestation and death threats.
Natarajan has dismissed the allegations as a “political conspiracy.” The Election Commission of India (ECI) is set to meet a Congress delegation on 10 June to hear the party’s objections.

Congress leader Meenakshi Natarajan on Wednesday, 10 June alleged that Returning Officers (ROs) overseeing the Rajya Sabha election in Madhya Pradesh were “compromised” and acting at the behest of the ruling government, following the cancellation of her nomination papers. The charge marks a sharp escalation in the Congress-BJP confrontation over what the party is calling a deliberate subversion of the electoral process.

The Nomination Cancellation

Natarajan was the Indian National Congress (Congress) party’s sole Rajya Sabha candidate from Madhya Pradesh. Her nomination was rejected after the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) raised a formal objection, alleging she had concealed information about a case pending before a court in Telangana. The objection centres on a petition filed by former corporate executive A. Srilatha before the Fourth Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate’s Court, in which Srilatha alleges that Natarajan provided political patronage to Kumbham Shivakumar Reddy — a person against whom Srilatha has levelled allegations including molestation and death threats.

Natarajan has categorically dismissed the allegations as a “political conspiracy,” and reportedly contested Srilatha’s petition before a Hyderabad court, arguing it was designed to damage her reputation.

What Natarajan Said

Speaking to reporters, Natarajan did not hold back. “I will say this with full responsibility that the returning officers yesterday were compromised. They were working as spokespersons and as the frontal organisation heads of the current government,” she said.

She further alleged a pattern of institutional pressure: “We are in a battlefield where Congress leaders are not only fighting against an opposition party. Unfortunately, the institutions that our constitutional forefathers created are now being disrespected, and they appear to be influenced in a way that makes us feel we are also fighting against them.”

On the technical grounds cited for rejecting her nomination, she was dismissive: “How can one not know how to fill a form? There is nothing legal or technical in this. This is just a political malintent which we saw at every step yesterday, how efforts were being made to subvert democracy.”

Election Commission Meeting

The Election Commission of India (ECI) is scheduled to meet a Congress delegation on Wednesday to hear the party’s objections to the rejection. Natarajan expressed cautious hope ahead of the meeting: “Somewhere we still have faith in the Constitutional establishments that somebody will still have conscience left with them, who can think of taking decisions based on constitutionality.”

Political Context

This is not the first time a Rajya Sabha nomination dispute has flared into a broader institutional row in India. Opposition parties have repeatedly accused Returning Officers of acting under political influence during upper-house elections, particularly in BJP-governed states. Notably, Madhya Pradesh is a BJP stronghold, and the cancellation of the Congress’s lone RS candidate’s papers effectively hands the ruling party an uncontested advantage. The ECI meeting will be closely watched as a test of whether the Commission acts on the party’s concerns before the election concludes.

Point of View

Or a technicality weaponised for electoral gain. The Congress’s institutional faith argument also cuts both ways — the party has historically benefited from the same RO discretion it now condemns. The ECI’s response will set a precedent for how nomination objections in Rajya Sabha elections are adjudicated going forward.
NationPress
26 Jul 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Why was Meenakshi Natarajan’s Rajya Sabha nomination cancelled?
Her nomination was cancelled after the BJP objected, alleging she had concealed information about a case pending before a court in Telangana. The case involves a petition by former corporate executive A. Srilatha against Kumbham Shivakumar Reddy, in which Natarajan is accused of providing political patronage.
What did Meenakshi Natarajan allege about the Returning Officers?
Natarajan alleged that the Returning Officers were ‘compromised’ and acting as spokespersons and frontal organisation heads of the current government, rather than as independent electoral functionaries.
What is the Election Commission of India doing about this?
The ECI is scheduled to meet a Congress delegation on 10 June to hear the party’s objections to the rejection of Natarajan’s nomination. The outcome of that meeting is expected to determine whether the Congress pursues further legal remedies.
What is the Telangana court case at the centre of the objection?
Former corporate executive A. Srilatha petitioned the Fourth Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate’s Court in Hyderabad, alleging that Natarajan gave political support to Kumbham Shivakumar Reddy, who faces allegations of molestation and death threats. Natarajan has opposed the petition, calling it a bid to malign her reputation.
What is Natarajan’s response to the allegations?
Natarajan has dismissed the allegations as a ‘political conspiracy’ and described the nomination rejection as an act of ‘political malintent’ aimed at subverting democracy, while saying she still holds cautious faith in constitutional institutions.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 month ago
  2. 1 month ago
  3. 1 month ago
  4. 1 month ago
  5. 1 month ago
  6. 1 month ago
  7. 1 month ago
  8. 1 month ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google