Ram Temple donation theft: Congress holds Modi accountable, raises 70-theft claim

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Ram Temple donation theft: Congress holds Modi accountable, raises 70-theft claim

Synopsis

Congress spokesperson Supriya Shrinate put PM Modi at the centre of the Ram Temple donation theft row, citing 70 thefts in 40 days, a tainted SIT head, a trust treasurer absent for most of the month, and an RTI exemption that keeps the trust's finances in the dark. The BJP and the trust have yet to respond.

Key Takeaways

Congress spokesperson Supriya Shrinate held PM Modi accountable for alleged theft of Ram Temple donations at a press conference in Chandigarh on 10 July .
She alleged 70 thefts occurred within 40 days at the Ram Temple, calling it unprecedented.
Congress questioned the appointment of Vijay Vishwas Pant as SIT head, noting he reportedly faces an FIR for fraud ; the SIT report has not been made public.
Trust general secretary Champat Rai Bansal allegedly hired a private security agency owned by a former BJP MP for ₹1 crore per month despite existing police cover.
The Ram Mandir Trust has been exempted from the RTI Act , and an offer by L&T to build the temple for Re 1 was reportedly rejected.

Congress spokesperson Supriya Shrinate on Friday, 10 July held Prime Minister Narendra Modi directly accountable for the alleged theft of donations at the Ram Temple in Ayodhya, arguing that a leader who claimed exclusive credit for the temple's construction cannot now distance himself from the financial irregularities surrounding it. Shrinate made the remarks at a press conference in Chandigarh, flanked by Punjab Congress president Amarinder Singh Raja Warring and other party leaders.

The Scale of the Alleged Theft

Shrinate, who chairs the All India Congress Committee (AICC)'s Social Media and Digital Platforms department, described the alleged pilferage as far more than a routine crime. She said the incident amounted to a “brutal attack on the faith and trust of crores of Hindus” who had donated their hard-earned money to the temple. According to her, 70 thefts had taken place within a span of 40 days — a frequency she described as unprecedented in history. She squarely blamed the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), calling it a “cardinal sin.”

Questions Over the SIT and Its Head

Congress trained its fire on the composition and conduct of the Special Investigation Team (SIT) set up to probe the matter. Shrinate questioned the appointment of Vijay Vishwas Pant as SIT head, noting that he himself was reportedly facing a First Information Report (FIR) for fraud. She argued that the government could not find a more credible officer for such a sensitive probe. She also pointed out that the SIT report had not been made public, raising transparency concerns.

Trust Officials Under the Spotlight

The Congress spokesperson questioned why Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teertha Kshetra Trust general secretary Champat Rai Bansal and his colleague Anil Mishra had been left out of the accountability framework, calling their mere resignation an inadequate response. She further questioned why Bansal had engaged a private security agency — reportedly owned by a former BJP member of Parliament — at a cost of ₹1 crore per month, even as Uttar Pradesh Police and central security forces were already deployed at the temple premises.

Shrinate also raised concerns about trust treasurer Govind Giri, who, she alleged, claimed not to reside in Ayodhya and sent a representative for only five days a month to review accounts. She questioned whether this reflected the level of seriousness these officials brought to managing the faith of millions.

RTI Exemption and L&T Offer

Congress also flagged that the Ram Mandir Trust had been exempted from the Right to Information (RTI) Act, which it said shielded the institution from public scrutiny. Shrinate further alleged that infrastructure major Larsen & Toubro (L&T) had offered to construct the temple for a token amount of Re 1, an offer that was reportedly turned down — a decision she said was motivated by the desire to keep financial transactions opaque.

She reiterated that the trust's members were chosen by Prime Minister Modi and that their primary qualification, she alleged, was their affiliation with the RSS. The BJP and the trust are yet to formally respond to the specific allegations raised at the press conference. As scrutiny over the Ram Temple's financial management intensifies, the political battle over accountability is set to sharpen ahead of the next electoral cycle.

Point of View

Congress is attempting to turn a governance failure into a credibility crisis. The RTI exemption for the trust and the non-disclosure of the SIT report are legitimate accountability gaps that the government has not addressed publicly. Whether the opposition can sustain this pressure beyond a press conference cycle — and whether any independent audit mechanism emerges — will determine whether this controversy leaves a lasting mark or fades into the news cycle.
NationPress
10 Jul 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Ram Temple donation theft controversy?
The controversy centres on alleged theft of donations received at the Ram Temple in Ayodhya, with Congress claiming that 70 thefts occurred within 40 days. The matter has triggered political accusations against the BJP-appointed Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teertha Kshetra Trust and the government.
Why is Congress holding PM Modi accountable?
Congress argues that since PM Modi publicly claimed exclusive credit for the Ram Temple's construction — sidelining even the Shankaracharyas — he cannot now remain silent on financial irregularities within the trust. The party contends that accountability follows the credit.
Who is Vijay Vishwas Pant and why is his appointment controversial?
Vijay Vishwas Pant is the head of the Special Investigation Team formed to probe the alleged thefts. Congress has questioned his appointment, alleging he himself faces an FIR for fraud, and has also criticised the government for not releasing the SIT report publicly.
What is the allegation against trust general secretary Champat Rai Bansal?
Congress alleges that Champat Rai Bansal hired a private security agency, reportedly owned by a former BJP MP, for ₹1 crore per month, despite Uttar Pradesh Police and central security forces already being deployed at the Ram Temple. Congress has demanded his accountability beyond a mere resignation.
Why is the RTI exemption for the Ram Mandir Trust significant?
The exemption from the Right to Information Act means the public and media cannot formally seek financial or administrative records from the trust. Congress argues this exemption shields the trust from scrutiny and enabled the alleged financial irregularities to go unchecked.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 20 min ago
  2. 21 min ago
  3. 4 days ago
  4. 6 days ago
  5. 1 week ago
  6. 3 weeks ago
  7. 3 weeks ago
  8. 3 weeks ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google