Did Congress Celebrate the Court's Ruling on the National Herald Case?
Synopsis
Following a significant Delhi court ruling, Congress leaders are celebrating the dismissal of the ED's allegations against prominent figures Rahul and Sonia Gandhi, viewing it as a victory against political malice. This case has highlighted concerns over the misuse of investigative agencies for political ends.
Key Takeaways
Delhi court dismissed ED's complaint against Rahul and Sonia Gandhi.
Congress leaders view ruling as a victory against political exploitation.
Investigative agencies should not be used for political motives.
Subramanian Swamy's private complaint Judicial independence emphasized through the ruling.
New Delhi, Dec 17 (NationPress) Congress officials expressed their support on Wednesday following a Delhi court's rejection of the Enforcement Directorate's (ED) money laundering allegations against Rahul Gandhi and Sonia Gandhi in the National Herald matter, labeling the investigation as politically driven.
A special press conference was convened in New Delhi, featuring party president Mallikarjun Kharge and prominent leaders Abhishek Manu Singhvi and K.C. Venugopal.
During the briefing, Abhishek Manu Singhvi remarked, “In this instance, due to political power, accusations were rampant while laws were disregarded.” He outlined the history of the investigations, indicating, “Between 2021-2025, the ED questioned Rahul Gandhi for 50 hours, Kharge ji for 5-6 hours, and Sonia ji for 7-8 hours.”
Singhvi further noted that the case had been ongoing for years: “This saga began in 2014 with private complainant Subramanian Swamy, who continuously communicated with the CBI and ED. From 2014 to 2021, for seven years, both agencies documented that no predicate offence existed. I base this on official documents.”
He elaborated on the legal context: “The CBI is responsible for predicting offences, while the ED handles money laundering. Both agencies reached a joint agreement, stating in paragraph 232 that no FIR could be generated in this case due to the absence of a predicate offence. Yet, an FIR was filed on June 30, 2021. If this isn't a case of political malice, then what is?”
Mallikarjun Kharge condemned the utilization of investigative bodies for political gains.
“The National Herald case was initiated with the purpose of political vendetta. This publication wasn't established yesterday; it was founded by freedom fighters for independence. However, individuals are now employing the CBI and ED to tarnish and disrupt, particularly targeting the Gandhi family,” stated Kharge.
“Issues lacking substance are being artificially inflated to harass our Congress leaders. They have exploited ED cases politically, swaying numerous MPs to form governments in various regions. Today, justice has prevailed. We welcome this ruling, affirming ‘Satyamev Jayate,’” he added.
This press conference followed the Delhi court's earlier ruling on Tuesday, which dismissed the ED's complaint under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, declaring the case was based on a private complaint from BJP leader Subramanian Swamy and not on a first information report (FIR), thereby rendering it legally invalid.
The Congress leaders maintained that this judgment reaffirmed the judiciary's independence and highlighted the need to refrain from misusing investigative agencies for political agendas.
Point of View
It is essential to recognize that the ongoing political narrative surrounding the National Herald case reflects broader concerns about the integrity of investigative processes. The dismissal of the ED's complaint underscores the importance of judicial independence and raises questions about the appropriateness of using law enforcement as a tool for political maneuvering.
NationPress
20 Jun 2026
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the outcome of the Delhi court ruling?
The Delhi court dismissed the ED's money laundering complaint against Rahul and Sonia Gandhi, stating it was based on a private complaint and not a valid FIR.
Why did Congress leaders call the ED probe politically motivated?
Congress leaders argued that the ED's investigation was initiated with the intent of political vendetta against the Gandhi family and was not based on substantive evidence.
Who is Subramanian Swamy?
Subramanian Swamy is a BJP leader who filed a private complaint that led to the ED's investigation into the National Herald case.
What does 'Satyamev Jayate' mean?
'Satyamev Jayate' is a Sanskrit phrase meaning 'Truth Alone Triumphs,' often used to signify the victory of truth over falsehood.
What are the implications of this ruling for investigative agencies?
The ruling emphasizes the need for the independence of the judiciary and cautions against the misuse of investigative agencies for political purposes.
