Why is CPI(M) Opposing the 'Push-Back' of Illegal Bangladeshi Infiltrators?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The CPI(M) raises concerns over the controversial push-back of alleged illegal Bangladeshi migrants. They argue for proper legal procedures and respect for human dignity in handling the situation. As tensions rise, the political implications of these actions are scrutinized, raising questions about the government's approach to immigration and communal policies.
Key Takeaways
- CPI(M) criticizes the push-back policy for illegal Bangladeshi migrants.
- Calls for adherence to legal protocols in dealing with infiltrators.
- The party emphasizes human rights for all individuals.
- Criticism of Assam government's communal policies and militarization.
- Political tensions rise between CPI(M) and BJP regarding infiltration issues.
Kolkata, May 31 (NationPress) The CPI(M) Polit Bureau, on Saturday, criticized the “push-back” and deportation of alleged illegal Bangladeshi nationals across the Indo-Bangladesh border. The party has urged the government to follow established protocols when addressing issues related to Bangladeshi infiltrators.
In light of the terrorist incident at Pahalgam, the CPI(M) stated, “The BJP-led state governments and the Central government are unfairly targeting Bengali-speaking Muslims, pushing them back to Bangladesh without any verification. Reports indicate that even legitimate Indian citizens are being wrongfully arrested and sent to Bangladesh. Individuals designated as foreign nationals by the Foreigners Tribunals, whose appeals are still pending before the Assam High Court and the Supreme Court, have also been forcibly repatriated. This practice must cease,” the CPI(M) Polit Bureau declared in a statement.
The party also criticized the Assam government for its aggressive communal policies, which now include arming the ‘indigenous people’.
“This alarming decision could have serious consequences. The government must ensure law and order while preventing infiltration. Resorting to push-backs and targeting specific communities is not a viable solution,” the Polit Bureau emphasized.
The CPI(M) leadership insisted that religion should not be a criterion for identifying illegal migrants.
They argued that individuals who have entered the nation illegally should still be granted access to a fair trial.
“Undocumented migrants who arrive without any ill intentions deserve to be treated with respect and processed according to established protocols,” the Polit Bureau's statement highlighted.
The West Bengal unit of the BJP responded by claiming that leftist parties consistently oppose government actions against infiltrators due to their appeasement politics. “In West Bengal, while the ruling Trinamool Congress fosters illegal infiltration, the CPI(M) stands against actions taken against these infiltrators. Both parties are merely two sides of the same coin,” stated a BJP state committee member.
Point of View
It is crucial to recognize the complexities surrounding migration and border policies. While national security is paramount, it is equally important to uphold human rights and ensure fair treatment for all individuals, regardless of their immigration status. The discourse must focus on creating effective, humane solutions that prioritize both security and compassion.
NationPress
08/06/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What does CPI(M) stand for?
CPI(M) stands for the Communist Party of India (Marxist), a major political party in India.
What is the Indo-Bangladesh border issue?
The Indo-Bangladesh border issue involves the management and regulation of illegal immigration from Bangladesh into India.
Why is the push-back policy controversial?
The push-back policy is controversial because it may violate human rights and due process, particularly for vulnerable populations.
What are Foreigners Tribunals?
Foreigners Tribunals are quasi-judicial bodies in India that determine whether a person is a foreign national or a citizen.
What is the CPI(M) demanding regarding illegal migrants?
The CPI(M) demands that illegal migrants be treated with dignity and granted access to fair trials, rather than being forcibly repatriated.
