Union Home Ministry Requests Officers from Darjeeling for Central Deputation
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Kolkata, March 13 (NationPress) In light of recent issues surrounding a protocol breach during President Droupadi Murmu's visit to the Darjeeling district of West Bengal for the International Santal Conclave last week, the Union Ministry of Home Affairs has requested one Indian Administrative Service (IAS) officer and one Indian Police Service (IPS) officer from the district for central deputation.
The officers in question are the current district magistrate of Darjeeling, Manish Mishra, and the commissioner of the Siliguri Metropolitan Police, C. Sudhakar.
A notification regarding this request has already been sent to the state secretariat at Nabanna from the Union Ministry of Home Affairs on Friday, as per a source within the secretariat.
Notably, the state government has already relieved Mishra from his duties as the district magistrate. Sunil Agarwal, the former special secretary to the North Bengal Development Department, has been appointed as the new district magistrate.
According to regulations, since the President serves as the constitutional head of the nation, any failure regarding her security or protocol permits the Union Government to seek officers for central deputation, even if it goes against the state government's wishes.
The Supreme Court has affirmed the validity of Rule 6(1) of the IPS (Cadre) Rules, 1954, which grants the Union Government the power to override state decisions regarding the transfer and deputation of IPS officers when necessary. Should a state government decline to release a selected officer for central deputation, that officer may be prohibited from such deputation for five years.
These developments could impede the career progression of the concerned IPS officer, as a minimum of two years of central deputation is required for officers of the 2011 batch or later to qualify for empanelment as Inspector General.
The President attended the International Santal Conclave in Siliguri on March 7; however, complaints emerged regarding a breach of protocol during her visit, and even the President herself expressed subtle dissatisfaction.
There were further allegations that the protocol concerning her security was not adhered to.