Why is the Delhi HC questioning Patanjali's claim that other Chyawanprash products are 'dhoka'?

Click to start listening
Why is the Delhi HC questioning Patanjali's claim that other Chyawanprash products are 'dhoka'?

Synopsis

The Delhi High Court's recent hearing raises critical questions around Patanjali Ayurved's advertisement, which brands competitor Chyawanprash products as 'dhoka'. As Dabur seeks legal recourse, we explore the implications of such claims and what they mean for consumer trust in Ayurvedic products.

Key Takeaways

  • Delhi High Court reserves ruling on Dabur's plea against Patanjali.
  • Advertisements must maintain integrity to avoid misleading consumers.
  • Legal challenges in the Ayurvedic sector are intensifying.
  • Consumer trust is essential for brand credibility.
  • Public opinion can significantly impact brand reputation.

New Delhi, Nov 6 (NationPress) The Delhi High Court has postponed its ruling on Dabur India's request for a temporary injunction against Patanjali Ayurved's recent advertisement, which reportedly labels all other Chyawanprash products as "dhoka".

During the proceedings, Justice Tejas Karia of a single-judge Bench challenged Patanjali on its assertion that all competing Chyawanprash brands are fraudulent while positioning its own product as the only "truth".

"You may suggest that others are subpar. However, declaring them dhoka is unacceptable. How can you categorize all other Chyawanprash as dhoka? You can claim they are inferior, but labeling them as fraud is unwarranted. Is there not an alternative term that could be utilized rather than dhoka?" Justice Karia noted.

Dabur, which commands over 60% of the Chyawanprash market share, has taken legal action against Patanjali, accusing it of disparagement, defamation, and engaging in unfair competition.

The complaint referenced a widely disseminated 25-second advertisement where a mother is seen providing her child with Chyawanprash and the phrase "chalo dhoka khao", followed by Baba Ramdev asserting that "most people are consuming fraud in the name of Chyawanprash".

Senior advocate Sandeep Sethi, representing Dabur, contended that the wording suggests that "the majority of consumers are being deceived by Chyawanprash", despite all licensed producers being required to adhere to established Ayurvedic formulations.

"Labeling an entire category of products as dhoka is inherently disparaging. Given that it comes from a self-declared yoga expert, it carries greater weight as people tend to associate such statements with a level of credibility," Sethi argued, adding that the advertisement had received more than nine crore views within just five days.

Conversely, Patanjali's attorney, senior advocate Rajiv Nayar, defended the advertisement by stating: "Dhoka represents the ordinary. I am merely stating that all other Chyawanprash products are inferior to mine, which I have the right to express."

In response, Justice Karia remarked: "Ordinary or inferior is one thing. You can say inferior, but you cannot label them as fraud. You can discuss 51 herbs, yet why refer to these products as dhoka? Is this not a comparison?"

After extended deliberations, the Delhi High Court has reserved its ruling on Dabur's petition for an interim injunction.

This latest dispute follows months after Patanjali founder Baba Ramdev faced criticism for a series of videos in which he allegedly connected Hamdard's Rooh Afza with "Sharbat Jihad", leading the Delhi High Court to deem his comments prima facie contemptuous. In that instance, Ramdev was also instructed to remove the videos after the court described them as "shocking to the conscience".

Point of View

We maintain an unwavering commitment to delivering balanced news coverage. The ongoing legal contention between Dabur and Patanjali illustrates the fierce competition within the Ayurvedic sector. It's crucial for brands to uphold integrity and transparency, ensuring consumers can make informed decisions. This case serves as a pivotal reminder of the importance of responsible advertising in fostering trust within the marketplace.
NationPress
06/11/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main issue in the Delhi HC case?
The primary issue revolves around Patanjali's advertisement that claims other Chyawanprash products are 'dhoka', which Dabur argues is defamatory and misleading.
What is Dabur seeking from the court?
Dabur is requesting an interim injunction to halt Patanjali's advertisement that disparages its Chyawanprash products.
Who is representing Dabur in court?
Senior advocate Sandeep Sethi is representing Dabur in the Delhi High Court.
What did Justice Karia question Patanjali about?
Justice Karia questioned how Patanjali can label all other Chyawanprash products as 'dhoka' without using a more appropriate term.
What was the public reaction to the advertisement?
The advertisement has garnered significant attention, amassing over nine crore views within just five days, indicating a strong public interest.
Nation Press