Will the Delhi HC grant bail to accused in the 2020 riots 'larger conspiracy' case?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a significant development, the Delhi High Court has reserved its decision on the bail applications of key figures involved in the 2020 Delhi riots 'larger conspiracy' case. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta argued that their release could undermine national security, as the accused are linked to a planned attempt to embarrass India on a global stage.
Key Takeaways
- The Delhi High Court has reserved its verdict on key bail applications.
- Solicitor General Mehta opposes bail based on national security concerns.
- The case is framed as a premeditated conspiracy rather than a mere riot.
- The accused are alleged to have attempted to create religious divisions.
- Next hearing set for Shadab Ahmed's bail plea.
New Delhi, July 9 (NationPress) The Delhi High Court has reserved its ruling on the bail applications of Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam, and several other individuals implicated in the 2020 Delhi riots 'larger conspiracy' case.
During the proceedings, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, who represents the Delhi Police, argued against the bail requests, emphasizing that the extended detention of the accused should not serve as justification for their release while awaiting trial. He stated that the individuals were entangled in a well-coordinated criminal conspiracy aimed at discrediting the nation ahead of US President Donald Trump's visit in 2020.
"If you (referring to the accused) are acting against the nation, then you should remain incarcerated until acquitted or convicted," stated Solicitor General Mehta before Justices Naveen Chawla and Shalinder Kaur.
"This is not merely a case of bail in standard riot instances; it constitutes a carefully planned and orchestrated criminal conspiracy that originated in the national capital with a specific date and time in mind," he added.
Solicitor General Mehta cited speeches made by Sharjeel Imam, indicating a scheme to divide the nation along religious lines.
"Their goal was to split the nation based on religion and to inflict national disgrace on a global scale," he proclaimed.
Throughout his arguments, Mehta referenced various global media reports concerning the Delhi riots, asserting that the accused were not protesting against a law but were instead plotting something far more nefarious.
He also referenced a previous court ruling denying bail to Umar Khalid, labeling the entire incident as a "terrorist act."
"This should not be dismissed as a mere riot case. It is a premeditated assault on the nation's sovereignty, executed in the capital," Mehta concluded.
The bench led by Justice Chawla is set to consider the bail application of Shadab Ahmed on Thursday at 4 p.m.
Point of View
It is imperative to view this case through a lens of national unity and accountability. The allegations of a deliberate conspiracy to disrupt public order and undermine the nation's sovereignty warrant a thorough examination. Upholding the rule of law should remain our foremost priority, ensuring that justice is served while safeguarding public trust.
NationPress
10/09/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the basis for opposing the bail pleas?
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta argued that the defendants' release could jeopardize national security and that the case involves a well-planned conspiracy, not just a standard riot.
What was the nature of the allegations against the accused?
The accused are alleged to be part of a coordinated effort aimed at creating national embarrassment during a significant international visit.
When will the next hearing take place?
The next hearing for the bail plea of Shadab Ahmed is scheduled for Thursday at 4 p.m.
What did the previous court ruling indicate about Umar Khalid?
The earlier court ruling denied bail to Umar Khalid and described his actions as part of a 'terrorist act.'
Why is this case considered significant?
This case is viewed as crucial due to its implications for national security and its potential impact on public order and communal harmony.
