What Will Be the Delhi HC's Decision on the Bail Pleas of Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The Delhi High Court is set to reveal a pivotal decision regarding the bail pleas of Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam, and others involved in the 2020 riots conspiracy. This ruling could have significant implications for the accused and the ongoing legal proceedings surrounding the controversial case.
Key Takeaways
- Delhi High Court's ruling on bail pleas is imminent.
- Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam are key accused in the 2020 Delhi riots case.
- Solicitor General opposes bail citing national security concerns.
- Case involves allegations of a larger conspiracy to disrupt peace.
- Implications of the ruling could affect future legal cases.
New Delhi, Sep 1 (NationPress) The Delhi High Court is set to announce its verdict on the bail applications of Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam, and others implicated in the alleged 'larger conspiracy' surrounding the 2020 riots. According to the court's published schedule, a panel of Justices Navin Chawla and Shalinder Kaur will deliver the ruling in the post-lunch session on September 2.
In July, the Bench led by Justice Chawla had reserved judgment after listening to the arguments presented by the defense and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Delhi Police.
Challenging the bail requests, Mehta stated that the prolonged detention of the accused should not be a reason for their release, as they are implicated in a meticulously planned criminal conspiracy designed to bring shame to the nation ahead of US President Donald Trump's visit in 2020.
He asserted, 'If you are acting against the nation, you should remain incarcerated until your acquittal or conviction.'
Mehta emphasized, 'This is not a typical case of rioting; it is a calculated and deliberate conspiracy initiated in the nation's capital with a specific agenda.'
Referencing speeches made by Sharjeel Imam, he argued that there was an intent to fracture national unity along religious lines, aiming for global embarrassment.
During his statement, Mehta cited multiple international media references regarding the riots, contending that the accused were not merely protesting but were engaged in something much more nefarious.
He recalled a previous court ruling which labeled Khalid's actions as a 'terrorist act.'
Mehta concluded, 'This should not be viewed as a simple riots case; it represents a premeditated assault on the nation’s sovereignty, executed in the capital.'
Point of View
It is imperative to remain impartial in the coverage of this sensitive case. The ongoing legal proceedings must be reported with due diligence, ensuring that both sides are presented fairly while upholding the principles of justice and national integrity.
NationPress
01/09/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the significance of the Delhi High Court's decision?
The court's ruling on the bail pleas of Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam is crucial, as it could influence ongoing investigations and set precedents for similar cases.
What are the accusations against Khalid and Imam?
They are accused of being involved in a larger conspiracy related to the 2020 Delhi riots, which reportedly aimed to create national unrest.
When will the verdict be pronounced?
The verdict is scheduled to be announced on September 2, during the post-lunch session of the court.
Who is representing the Delhi Police in this case?
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta is representing the Delhi Police and opposing the bail pleas.
What arguments are being made against granting bail?
The Solicitor General argues that the accused's involvement in a premeditated conspiracy warrants continued detention until trial.
