Will the Delhi High Court Hear Lalu Prasad's Plea in the IRCTC Hotel Scam Case Tomorrow?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
New Delhi, Jan 4 (NationPress) Tomorrow, the Delhi High Court is set to review a petition from former Bihar Chief Minister Lalu Prasad Yadav, contesting a trial court's ruling that mandated the initiation of cheating and corruption charges against him and his family in connection with the IRCTC hotel scam.
This case is scheduled for discussion before Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma.
The chief of the Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) argues that there is a lack of sufficient evidence to move forward with allegations of corruption, criminal conspiracy, and cheating.
His plea challenges the ruling from the Rouse Avenue Court, which authorized the filing of criminal charges against him and his relatives.
On October 13, 2025, Special Judge (PC Act) Vishal Gogne of the Rouse Avenue Courts permitted the trial of Lalu Prasad Yadav, his son Tejashwi Yadav, his wife Rabri Devi, along with other implicated individuals under Sections 420 (cheating) and 120B (criminal conspiracy) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), as well as under the Prevention of Corruption Act, after they denied the charges.
The special court had reserved its order on May 29 following extensive arguments regarding the framing of charges against Lalu Prasad and other accused, including Prem Gupta, Sarla Gupta, and Railway officials Rakesh Saksena and P.K. Goyal.
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) alleges that the purported scam transpired from 2004 to 2009, during Lalu Prasad's tenure as Union Railway Minister.
It is claimed that two hotels operated by the Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation (IRCTC) were leased to a private company in breach of regulations, and that prime land in Patna was improperly allocated to Lalu Prasad's family and a proxy company in exchange.
One hotel was reportedly leased to Sarla Gupta, the spouse of Prem Gupta, a close associate of Lalu Prasad and a former Rajya Sabha MP.
The prosecution contends that the RJD leader acquired three acres of valuable land via a proxy entity.
In defending himself, Lalu Prasad insists that there were no irregularities in the process, asserting that the tenders were awarded justly and has sought to be absolved of the case.