Delhi Police arrest Badarpur man in ₹2 lakh garment supply cyber fraud
Synopsis
A 41-year-old Delhi man posed as a garment supplier, used fake catalogues and invoices to extract ₹2 lakh from a manufacturer, and was tracked down by Shahdara's Cyber Police Station. Bank accounts linked to him have now surfaced in six cybercrime complaints — suggesting the fraud may extend well beyond the single victim who came forward.
Key Takeaways
Pawan Kumar Dugar , 41 , of Badarpur, Delhi , was arrested by Shahdara Cyber Police Station on 23 October 2026 .
The accused allegedly defrauded complainant Neeraj Kumar Jain of approximately ₹2 lakh by posing as a garment and sewing machine materials supplier.
Dugar reportedly used fake catalogues, invoices, and transport documents to gain the victim's trust before vanishing with the payment.
Bank accounts linked to the accused have appeared in six separate cybercrime complaints , indicating potential multiple victims.
A mobile phone allegedly used to contact the complainant was recovered during the raid.
Further investigation is underway to trace the complete money trail and identify additional victims.
Delhi Police have arrested a 41-year-old man for allegedly defrauding a garment manufacturer of approximately ₹2 lakh by posing as a supplier of ready-made garments and sewing machine materials. The accused, Pawan Kumar Dugar, a resident of Badarpur in Delhi, was apprehended on 23 October by the Cyber Police Station of Shahdara district following a targeted technical investigation.
How the Fraud Unfolded
The case stems from a complaint filed by Neeraj Kumar Jain, who is engaged in manufacturing ready-made garments and trading in garment-related materials. According to police, on 6 July, Dugar contacted Jain and posed as a legitimate supplier, claiming the required goods were readily available for delivery.
To build credibility, the accused reportedly shared catalogues, invoices, and transport-related documents, and repeatedly assured Jain that the ordered goods would be dispatched on time. Relying on these representations, Jain transferred approximately ₹2 lakh across multiple transactions. The promised goods were never delivered, and the money was not refunded, prompting registration of a cyber fraud case.
Technical Investigation and Arrest
A dedicated team from Shahdara's Cyber Police Station used technical analysis to establish leads about the accused's location in Badarpur, subsequently conducting a raid and detaining him. The operation was led by Inspector Vijay Kumar, Station House Officer of the Cyber Police Station, under the overall supervision of the Assistant Commissioner of Police (Operations), Shahdara.
The arrest team comprised Sub-Inspector Sunil Dev Sihag, Head Constable Ravi Malik, and Head Constable Sandeep. Police recovered a mobile phone from the accused that was allegedly used to contact the complainant.
Wider Fraud Network Under Scrutiny
Financial scrutiny conducted during the investigation revealed that bank accounts linked to Dugar had surfaced in six separate cybercrime complaints, involving multiple victims and suspected fraudulent transactions worth lakhs of rupees. According to police, the investigation indicates the accused allegedly acted as the caller and was directly involved in the fraudulent dealings.
Notably, this case follows a pattern of cyber fraud targeting small business owners and traders — a segment increasingly vulnerable to sophisticated impersonation schemes involving fake trade documents and invoices. Investigators are now working to trace the complete money trail, identify additional victims, and determine the full extent of the alleged fraud.
What Happens Next
Further investigation is underway, with police seeking to establish whether Dugar operated alone or as part of a larger network. The recovery of financial links to six other complaints suggests a broader operation may be in play. The outcome of this investigation could lead to additional arrests and the identification of more victims across Delhi.
Point of View
But the real story here is the six-complaint bank trail — a classic sign of a serial operator rather than a one-off opportunist. Small traders and manufacturers remain disproportionately targeted by such impersonation frauds because they operate on trust and informal credit, making fake documentation far more persuasive. Delhi's cyber cells are getting better at technical tracing, but the speed of prosecution and asset recovery — not just arrest — is what will actually deter this category of fraud. That part of the story remains unresolved.
NationPress
23 Oct 2026
Frequently Asked Questions
Who was arrested in the Delhi garment supply cyber fraud case?
Pawan Kumar Dugar , a 41-year-old resident of Badarpur, Delhi, was arrested by the Cyber Police Station of Shahdara district. He is accused of posing as a garment and sewing machine materials supplier to defraud a manufacturer of approximately ₹2 lakh.
How did the accused carry out the fraud?
According to police, Dugar contacted complainant Neeraj Kumar Jain on 6 July, posed as a legitimate supplier, and shared fake catalogues, invoices, and transport documents to gain trust. After Jain transferred approximately ₹2 lakh across multiple transactions, the goods were never delivered and no refund was made.
Are there more victims in this case?
Possibly. Financial scrutiny revealed that bank accounts linked to Dugar have surfaced in six separate cybercrime complaints involving multiple victims and suspected fraudulent transactions worth lakhs of rupees. Police are investigating the full extent of the alleged fraud.
What evidence was recovered from the accused?
Police recovered a mobile phone from Dugar that was allegedly used to contact the complainant. Financial records linking his bank accounts to six other cybercrime complaints were also identified during the investigation.
What is the current status of the investigation?
Further investigation is underway to trace the complete money trail, identify additional victims, and determine whether the accused operated alone or as part of a larger network. The case was registered as a cyber fraud under relevant sections following Jain's complaint.
