Did a Woman SI and 2 Others from Delhi Police Demand a Rs 2 Lakh Bribe?

Click to start listening
Did a Woman SI and 2 Others from Delhi Police Demand a Rs 2 Lakh Bribe?

Synopsis

In a shocking revelation, three Delhi Police officers, including a female sub-inspector, have been accused of demanding bribes totaling over Rs 2 lakh. They reportedly threatened innocent citizens with false cases. This incident raises serious concerns about corruption within the police force and highlights the importance of vigilance in reporting such misconduct.

Key Takeaways

  • Three Delhi Police officers were booked for demanding bribes.
  • Bribes totaled over Rs 2 lakh.
  • The officers threatened to file false cases against victims.
  • The allegations were substantiated by the Vigilance Branch.
  • Citizens can report bribery incidents via Helpline No. 1064.

New Delhi, Sep 4 (NationPress) Three personnel from the Delhi Police, including a female sub-inspector, have been charged for soliciting bribes exceeding Rs 2 lakh from a Naraina resident and a couple in Uttam Nagar. They allegedly threatened to file false cases against the victims, according to a senior official from the Vigilance Department.

Sub-Inspector Vijeta Gautam, alongside HC Rakesh Kumar and Constable Sanjay, all stationed at the Police Station Cyber West District, Hari Nagar, have been implicated in two separate incidents filed under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, as stated by the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Vigilance.

The first incident stemmed from a complaint by a Naraina Village resident who claimed he was summoned by SI Vijeta and Constable Sanjay. They informed him that his Aadhaar and PAN had been misused, allegedly to open a Paytm Agent Merchant KYC account currently under investigation for irregularities.

The police officers demanded an illegal payment of Rs 50,000, threatening to implicate him in a false case if he refused.

Following an inquiry by the Vigilance Branch, the claims of harassment and bribery were substantiated, leading to a case being filed against the officers under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, in conjunction with Section 61(2) of BNS, 2023.

The second case arose from a written complaint by a Uttam Nagar resident who accused the officers of demanding and accepting Rs 1.85 lakh from her and her husband to close a case regarding a fake Instagram ID registered against her spouse at PS Cyber West District.

Despite the initial payment, the officers allegedly continued to solicit more bribes.

The Vigilance Branch inquiry confirmed the claims of harassment and bribery, resulting in another case being registered at the Police Station, Vigilance, under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The DCP, Vigilance, urged citizens to report any instances of police personnel demanding bribes through Helpline No. 1064.

Point of View

It is crucial to highlight that the integrity of our law enforcement agencies is paramount. This incident underscores the necessity for stringent oversight and accountability measures to restore public trust. The vigilance against corruption must be relentless to ensure justice is served.
NationPress
04/09/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What were the charges against the police personnel?
The charges include demanding bribes exceeding Rs 2 lakh from citizens under threat of false cases, which is a violation of the Prevention of Corruption Act.
How can citizens report bribery incidents?
Citizens can report any instance of police personnel demanding bribes by calling Helpline No. 1064.
What is the role of the Vigilance Department?
The Vigilance Department investigates allegations of corruption and misconduct within public services, including the police.
What actions were taken against the accused officers?
A case was registered against the officers under the Prevention of Corruption Act after the allegations were substantiated.
What is the importance of reporting police misconduct?
Reporting police misconduct is essential to uphold accountability, ensure justice, and restore public trust in law enforcement.