Is Dropping Gandhi’s Name from Employment Scheme an Act of Ideological Intolerance?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a bold statement, Kerala's Leader of the Opposition, V.D. Satheesan, condemns the Union government's decision to remove Mahatma Gandhi's name from a national employment scheme. He argues that this reflects a growing ideological intolerance and a threat to Gandhian principles in India. Discover the implications of this controversial change.
Key Takeaways
- Removal of Gandhi's name reflects ideological intolerance.
- Gandhian values are crucial to India's identity.
- Employment guarantee scheme has transformed rural economies.
- Political opposition is crucial for democratic discourse.
- Public resistance is vital in such ideological battles.
Thiruvananthapuram, Dec 16 (NationPress) The Leader of the Opposition in Kerala, V.D. Satheesan, has vehemently criticized the Union government's recent decision to remove Mahatma Gandhi's name from the national employment guarantee scheme. He described this act as a clear reflection of ideological intolerance and a disregard for Gandhian values.
According to Satheesan, this decision reveals the Sangh Parivar's unease with Gandhi’s name and principles. He emphasized, "The Gandhian philosophy, which is rooted in non-violence, inclusivity, and social justice, serves as the moral backbone of the Indian Republic." He stated that groups motivated by divisive politics find it challenging to accept Gandhi’s teachings of love, unity, and reconciliation.
Satheesan accused the government of systematically attempting to erase the legacy of freedom fighters, noting that several welfare programs previously named after Jawaharlal Nehru, Indira Gandhi, and Rajiv Gandhi have been renamed as part of efforts to diminish their contributions.
He claimed that the current BJP-led administration is trying to present the nation as aligned with a singular ideological perspective, neglecting the vital roles played by the Congress and its leaders in the formation of modern India.
Discussing the employment guarantee program, Satheesan highlighted that it was initiated by the UPA government in 2005 and has been one of the most impactful welfare programs in independent India. It has significantly reduced hunger, alleviated rural distress, and empowered millions, particularly women, to attain economic independence. By providing wage employment, it has become a crucial safety net for the rural impoverished and a key element of social security.
He accused the Modi administration of attempting to claim ownership of the scheme while detaching it from its historical and ideological roots. He asserted that removing Gandhi's name would not lessen the importance of Gandhian ideals, which remain deeply ingrained in the nation's social and political consciousness.
"Gandhi's thoughts cannot be erased through administrative measures," Satheesan declared, insisting that the public would collectively resist this action. He urged the Centre to retract what he called an arrogant and unnecessary decision, cautioning that it would only exacerbate political divisions instead of serving any legitimate public benefit.
Point of View
The removal of Mahatma Gandhi’s name from a significant employment scheme is not just a political maneuver; it is a symbolic act that raises questions about ideological tolerance in contemporary India. It is essential to understand the historical context and the values that shaped the nation. As we navigate through this discussion, it is crucial to maintain a balanced viewpoint and acknowledge the contributions of all leaders in shaping India's progress.
NationPress
17/12/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the significance of Gandhi’s name in the employment scheme?
Mahatma Gandhi's name symbolizes peace, social justice, and inclusivity, which are foundational to India's democratic values.
Why is the decision to drop Gandhi's name controversial?
The decision is seen as an act of ideological intolerance, undermining Gandhi's principles and promoting a singular political narrative.
What impact has the employment guarantee scheme had?
Introduced in 2005, the scheme has been pivotal in reducing rural poverty and enhancing economic independence, especially for women.
How has the opposition responded to this decision?
The opposition, particularly V.D. Satheesan, has criticized the government, calling for a retraction of the decision and emphasizing the importance of Gandhian values.
What are the broader implications of this move?
This move could exacerbate political polarization and raise concerns regarding the ideological direction of the government.
