Nishikant Dubey Raises Concerns Over Congress-China Relations in Parliament
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
New Delhi, March 9 (NationPress) BJP Member of Parliament Nishikant Dubey announced on Monday his intention to bring up the matter of the Congress party's purported ties with China during a session in Parliament. He asserted that India effectively acknowledged China as a neighboring country following the events regarding Tibet in the early 1950s and the ensuing Panchsheel Agreement.
In an interview with IANS, Dubey stated, “I will address this in Parliament regarding the Congress’ connections with China. Initially, they were not even our neighbor. In 1950, we ceded Tibet to them, and by 1954-55, through the Panchsheel Agreement, we acknowledged them as our neighbor. In 1962, during the Sino-Indian War, we lost approximately 38,000 square kilometers of territory.”
Previously, Dubey had also posted on X, where he criticized the Congress leadership concerning India’s historical interactions with China.
In his post, he remarked that the friendship between China and the Nehru–Gandhi family “extends far back,” alleging that after “handing over” Tibet in 1950, India lost around 38,000 square kilometers of land in 1962.
Furthermore, Dubey claimed in the post that this was insufficient for the Congress, as they proceeded to grant China a license to undermine the entire nation.
He referenced a parliamentary reply from 1969, sharing a document that discussed allegations of financial support from the Chinese Embassy to Naxalites during that time.
The document shared by Dubey seems to be a written parliamentary response from 1969 regarding claims of financial aid from the Chinese Embassy to Naxalites. In the reply, the then Minister of State in the Ministry of Home Affairs, Vidya Charan Shukla, informed Parliament that the Kerala government had reported instances of Kunnikkal Narayanan of Calicut receiving money orders ranging from Rs 100 to Rs 500 from the Chinese Embassy in New Delhi on four occasions.
The response also mentioned that no other state government had reported similar assistance from the Chinese Embassy to individuals involved in violent or subversive activities. It additionally noted that no information was available with the Government regarding any financial aid from the Chinese Embassy to extremists after February 1969, emphasizing that strict vigilance was being maintained.
Dubey confirmed he would address this issue during the current session of Parliament.