Did the EC Really Dismiss the ‘Vote Theft’ Claims?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The Election Commission's recent dismissal of 'vote theft' allegations raises questions about electoral integrity. CEC Gyanesh Kumar firmly states the EC remains unwavering in its commitment to voters, highlighting the importance of transparency in the electoral process. This bold stance against misinformation emphasizes the EC's role in upholding democratic values.
Key Takeaways
- Election Commission firmly dismisses 'vote theft' allegations.
- CEC Gyanesh Kumar emphasizes transparency in electoral processes.
- The SIR initiative aims to verify electoral rolls accurately.
- Public display of voter information breaches privacy rights.
- EC stands committed to all voters without any discrimination.
New Delhi, Aug 17 (NationPress) The Election Commission (EC) on Sunday rejected allegations of ‘vote chori’ made by the Congress party, emphasizing that the poll panel stands steadfast with the voters, akin to a rock, and will never compromise the integrity of the electoral process, even amidst challenges.
At a press briefing, Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar also dismissed claims of any partiality in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) initiative in Bihar, reiterating that the EC’s doors remain open to all political entities.
He affirmed that the EC does not show favoritism towards any political party and will uphold its constitutional responsibilities regardless of party affiliations.
“All political factions and booth-level officers are diligently working on the ground in a transparent manner. They are scrutinizing documents and providing video testimonials. It is concerning that these verified documents and testimonials from district party presidents and their designated BLOs are either not reaching their respective state or national leaders or efforts are made to mislead them by overlooking the ground realities,” he stated.
The CEC also criticized the public exhibition of images of numerous voters, seemingly referencing Congress leader Rahul Gandhi’s recent press conference, where he alleged malpractices, and remarked that such actions infringe on privacy as per the Supreme Court’s prior ruling.
CEC Gyanesh Kumar further asserted that misleading attempts are being made to confuse voters and tarnish the image of the poll panel with false and mischievous allegations.
He declared that the charge of vote theft is entirely unfounded and asserted that misinformation regarding the SIR initiative in Bihar is being propagated.
He stated that the Election Commission will not be deterred by these tactics and firmly stands with the voters.
“When politics is conducted with pressure on the Election Commission, we want to clarify that we will not be intimidated by such tactics, and the EC stands unwavering with all voters across all backgrounds, including the poor, rich, elderly, women, and youth without any discrimination,” he concluded.
Point of View
It is imperative to acknowledge the Election Commission's role in maintaining electoral integrity. The dismissal of baseless allegations is crucial for public trust in democratic institutions. Upholding **transparency** and **fairness** should always be the priority in our electoral process. The EC's commitment to all voters, regardless of their affiliations, reflects a healthy democracy.
NationPress
08/10/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What were the allegations made by the Congress party?
The Congress party accused the Election Commission of 'vote theft' or 'vote chori' during the recent electoral revision process.
How did the Election Commission respond?
The Election Commission dismissed these allegations as unfounded and asserted its commitment to uphold the electoral process.
What is the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) drive?
The SIR drive is an initiative by the Election Commission aimed at updating and verifying electoral rolls in various states.
What does CEC Gyanesh Kumar say about transparency?
He emphasized that all political parties and booth-level officers are working transparently and that the EC does not discriminate among them.
What is the significance of privacy in elections?
The Chief Election Commissioner highlighted that public display of voter images can infringe on privacy rights, referencing a Supreme Court ruling.
