Why Did ECI Deny West Bengal Govt's Request to Revoke Disciplinary Action Against Electoral Officers?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The ECI's refusal to withdraw disciplinary actions against four electoral officers in West Bengal has stirred controversy, highlighting allegations of voter list manipulation. This ongoing situation raises questions about electoral integrity and administrative accountability in the region.
Key Takeaways
- ECI's decision strengthens electoral accountability.
- Allegations of voter manipulation investigated.
- Government response raises concerns about political influence.
- Electoral integrity remains a crucial issue in India.
- Key officials face serious allegations.
Kolkata, Jan 18 (NationPress) The Election Commission of India (ECI) has rejected the West Bengal government's appeal made last week for the withdrawal of its prior order imposing strict disciplinary measures, which include suspension and the filing of FIRs, against four electoral officers implicated in irregularities concerning the voter enrollment in two Assembly constituencies.
On Friday, a formal request was dispatched from the West Bengal government to the ECI via the office of the West Bengal Chief Electoral Officer (CEO), asking for the Commission to reconsider its earlier disciplinary measures affecting these four electoral officers, which include two Electoral Registration Officers (EROs) and two Assistant Electoral Registration Officers (AEROs).
However, on Saturday, the ECI's main office in New Delhi communicated to the CEO's office that the district magistrates, who also serve as district electoral officers (DEOs), must proceed with the Commission's initial directive to file FIRs against these four electoral officers, as confirmed by a source within the CEO's office.
Among the four officials directed to have FIRs registered against them are Debottam Dutta Chowdhury, the ERO for the Baruipur East Assembly constituency in South 24 Parganas, and Tathagata Mandal, the AERO for the same area.
The other two officers are Biplob Sarkar, the ERO for the Moyna Assembly constituency in East Midnapore, and Sudipta Das, the AERO of that constituency.
To recap, instructions were issued by the ECI's headquarters in New Delhi last August, mandating the suspension of these four electoral officers and the filing of FIRs against them.
Nevertheless, the West Bengal government only partially complied with the order, suspending the four officials while refraining from registering FIRs.
Additionally, a contractual Data Entry Operator was dismissed from his position.
Earlier this month, the ECI reiterated its directive to the district magistrates of South 24 Parganas and East Midnapore to file FIRs against the four electoral officers.
However, before the district electoral officers could initiate the FIR registration process, the state government submitted a request to withdraw the order for disciplinary action against the four officers.
The officials faced allegations of tampering with the voters' list, which led the ECI to mandate their suspension and the filing of FIRs.
Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee subsequently criticized the ECI for its directives, accusing the poll body of serving as the “bonded labour of the BJP.”
She also affirmed that her government would refrain from taking any punitive actions against its employees.
Point of View
The ECI's stand against the West Bengal government reflects a commitment to electoral integrity. The decision emphasizes the importance of accountability in the electoral process, ensuring that allegations of manipulation are thoroughly investigated and addressed. This stance serves the public interest by reinforcing trust in electoral institutions.
NationPress
18/01/2026
Frequently Asked Questions
What actions did the ECI take against the electoral officers?
The ECI ordered the suspension of four electoral officers and the registration of FIRs against them due to allegations of manipulation in voter enrollment.
Why did the West Bengal government request to withdraw the ECI's order?
The West Bengal government sought to withdraw the ECI's order for disciplinary action as part of their response to the allegations against the officials.
Who are the electoral officers involved in this case?
The four electoral officers include Debottam Dutta Chowdhury, Tathagata Mandal, Biplob Sarkar, and Sudipta Das, all facing allegations of voter list tampering.
What was Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee's response?
Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee criticized the ECI's directive, accusing it of being influenced by the BJP and asserting that her government would not take action against its employees.
What implications does this situation have for electoral integrity?
This controversy raises serious questions about the integrity of the electoral process in West Bengal and the accountability of electoral officials.
