ED attaches ₹5.54 crore assets in Jeevan Suraksha Ponzi scam, Assam

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
ED attaches ₹5.54 crore assets in Jeevan Suraksha Ponzi scam, Assam

Synopsis

The ED has attached ₹5.54 crore in bank balances and properties tied to the Jeevan Suraksha Group, an alleged Ponzi scheme that collected ₹403.63 crore from nearly 6.88 lakh investors across the Northeast — repaying less than a third before shutting down. Estimated proceeds of crime: ₹270.91 crore.

Key Takeaways

The ED provisionally attached assets worth ₹5.54 crore on 10 July under the PMLA, 2002 .
Attached assets include credit balances in 48 bank accounts (₹1.42 crore) and 22 immovable properties (₹4.11 crore) across Assam , Meghalaya , and West Bengal .
The Jeevan Suraksha Group allegedly collected ₹403.63 crore from nearly 6.88 lakh investors across 422 branches in northeastern states.
Only ₹132.72 crore was repaid to investors; estimated proceeds of crime stand at ₹270.91 crore .
The probe involves the CBI , Assam CID , SFIO , and ED — a multi-agency convergence reflecting the case's scale.

The Directorate of Enforcement (ED) has provisionally attached movable and immovable assets worth approximately ₹5.54 crore in connection with an alleged multi-crore Ponzi scam linked to the Jeevan Suraksha Group of Companies, officials confirmed on Friday, 10 July. The action was taken under Section 5(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002, as part of an ongoing money laundering probe centred in Guwahati, Assam.

Assets Attached

The attached assets comprise credit balances of approximately ₹1.42 crore lying across 48 bank accounts, along with 22 immovable properties valued at nearly ₹4.11 crore. These properties are spread across Assam, Meghalaya, and West Bengal.

The money laundering investigation was initiated on the basis of FIRs and charge sheets filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Anti-Corruption Branch, Guwahati, under various provisions of the Indian Penal Code and the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978. The case was also separately investigated by the Assam CID and the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO).

How the Alleged Scheme Operated

According to the ED, the Jeevan Suraksha Group allegedly ran a money circulation scheme through a network of around 422 branches spread across northeastern states, operating through several companies and sister concerns. The group is alleged to have lured nearly 6.88 lakh investors by offering recurring and fixed deposits, plot booking schemes, monthly income plans, and redeemable preference shares — all promising unusually high returns — without obtaining any statutory authorisation to accept public deposits.

Investigators allege the group collected nearly ₹403.63 crore from investors but repaid only around ₹132.72 crore, reportedly using fresh deposits to service earlier investors — a classic Ponzi structure — before abruptly shutting down operations. The estimated proceeds of crime stand at ₹270.91 crore.

Diversion of Funds

The ED further alleged that funds were systematically diverted to directors and their family members through cash withdrawals, insurance policies, fixed deposits, and inter-entity transfers, before being channelled into immovable properties. This layering pattern, investigators say, is consistent with structured money laundering aimed at distancing proceeds from their criminal origin.

Notably, this attachment follows a multi-agency investigative effort — a relatively rare convergence of the CBI, Assam CID, SFIO, and ED — reflecting the scale and complexity of the alleged fraud. With nearly seven lakh investors potentially affected across the Northeast, pressure on enforcement agencies to recover and return funds is expected to intensify as the case progresses.

Point of View

Assam CID, SFIO, and ED signals institutional embarrassment at how long the scheme ran: 422 branches, 6.88 lakh investors, and ₹403 crore collected before operations were shut. The real accountability question is not just who ran the scheme, but why statutory regulators did not catch an unauthorised deposit-taking operation of this scale sooner. Attaching ₹5.54 crore when the estimated crime proceeds are ₹270.91 crore also underlines how far the recovery effort still has to go.
NationPress
10 Jul 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Jeevan Suraksha Ponzi scam?
The Jeevan Suraksha Group of Companies allegedly ran an unauthorised money circulation scheme across northeastern India, collecting nearly ₹403.63 crore from around 6.88 lakh investors through fixed deposits, plot schemes, and monthly income plans promising unusually high returns. The group reportedly repaid only ₹132.72 crore before abruptly shutting down, leaving an estimated ₹270.91 crore in proceeds of crime.
What assets has the ED attached in this case?
The ED provisionally attached assets worth approximately ₹5.54 crore, comprising credit balances of around ₹1.42 crore in 48 bank accounts and 22 immovable properties valued at nearly ₹4.11 crore spread across Assam, Meghalaya, and West Bengal.
Under which law was the ED attachment made?
The attachment was made under Section 5(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002, based on FIRs and charge sheets filed by the CBI Anti-Corruption Branch, Guwahati, and investigations by the Assam CID and the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO).
How many investors were affected by the Jeevan Suraksha scam?
According to the ED, nearly 6.88 lakh investors across northeastern states were allegedly defrauded through the group's network of around 422 branches operating across multiple companies and sister concerns.
How were the funds allegedly laundered?
Investigators allege that funds collected from investors were diverted to directors and their family members via cash withdrawals, insurance policies, fixed deposits, and inter-entity transfers, before being invested in immovable properties — a layering method typical of structured money laundering.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 2 months ago
  2. 3 months ago
  3. 4 months ago
  4. 4 months ago
  5. 5 months ago
  6. 9 months ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google