ED files PMLA charge sheet against Kolkata IT firm VRM in fake call centre fraud

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
ED files PMLA charge sheet against Kolkata IT firm VRM in fake call centre fraud

Synopsis

The ED has filed a PMLA charge sheet against Kolkata-based VRM Business Services and its director Rajesh Goenka for running a fake call centre that allegedly defrauded foreign nationals of ₹20.35 crore through impersonation, VoIP-based coercion, and fictitious tech-support scams — with proceeds laundered into property and jewellery.

Key Takeaways

The Enforcement Directorate filed a PMLA charge sheet against VRM Business Services Private Limited and director Rajesh Goenka for operating an illegal call centre in Kolkata .
The accused allegedly defrauded foreign nationals of at least ₹20.35 crore through impersonation and fictitious tech-support services.
The ED had previously seized and frozen assets worth ₹2.35 crore and provisionally attached immovable property valued at ₹11.14 crore .
Callers used VoIP-based calls , impersonating representatives of multinational corporations to coerce victims into paying for non-existent services.
The case was initiated based on an FIR registered at Electronics Complex Bidhannagar Police Station , Kolkata .

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has filed a charge sheet under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002 against VRM Business Services Private Limited, a Kolkata-based information technology firm, and its director Rajesh Goenka, among others, for allegedly operating an illegal call centre that defrauded foreign nationals of at least ₹20.35 crore. The charge sheet, filed on 4 July 2025, follows a probe triggered by an FIR registered at the Electronics Complex Bidhannagar Police Station.

How the Fraud Operated

According to the ED, callers operating from VRM's premises impersonated representatives of reputed multinational corporations and contacted foreign-based victims through VoIP-based calls. The accused allegedly threatened victims under false pretences and induced them to make payments for gift vouchers and non-existent services — including fictitious subscription cancellations and technical support.

The ED's statement noted that the scheme involved 'fraudulent manipulation of computer systems', with callers using coercion and impersonation to extract money. The proceeds were then allegedly channelled into jewellery purchases and immovable properties, among other assets.

Assets Seized and Attached

Prior to filing the charge sheet, the ED had already taken significant action against the accused. The agency seized valuables and froze bank accounts worth ₹2.35 crore and provisionally attached immovable property valued at ₹11.14 crore under PMLA, 2002. In total, assets worth over ₹13 crore have been secured so far.

According to the ED, Rajesh Goenka, through VRM Business Services, was identified as the primary beneficiary of the proceeds of crime. Callers working out of the firm's premises were also named as beneficiaries in the charge sheet.

What the Investigation Revealed

The ED's PMLA probe found that VRM Business Services provided the physical and technical infrastructure required to run the illegal call centre. The operation was described as systematic — with the accused using impersonation, coercion, and computer manipulation to defraud victims across multiple countries.

The initial complaint that triggered the FIR alleged that Goenka and associates were running an unauthorised call centre, impersonating representatives of well-known service providers, collecting payments, and failing to deliver any service in return. The ED's subsequent investigation corroborated and expanded on these allegations.

Broader Context

This case is part of a wider pattern of India-based fake tech-support call centres targeting foreign nationals, particularly in the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia. Indian law enforcement and the ED have escalated action against such operations in recent years, with several crackdowns in Kolkata, Ahmedabad, and Noida. The use of PMLA provisions allows investigators to trace and attach assets acquired from criminal proceeds, even when primary criminal charges are handled by state police.

The charge sheet marks a significant escalation in the case, and trial proceedings are expected to follow in the designated PMLA court.

Point of View

The agency is attempting to dismantle the financial architecture, not just the front operation. The critical question is whether the attached assets — ₹13 crore out of an alleged ₹20.35 crore in proceeds — are sufficient to deter similar setups, or whether the gap between seizure and total proceeds reflects structural limits in tracing laundered funds. For foreign governments whose nationals were victimised, the charge sheet also signals that India is moving beyond FIR-stage action, though extradition and restitution remain distant prospects.
NationPress
3 Jul 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the ED case against VRM Business Services?
The Enforcement Directorate filed a charge sheet under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 against VRM Business Services Private Limited and its director Rajesh Goenka for allegedly running an illegal call centre in Kolkata that defrauded foreign nationals of at least ₹20.35 crore. The accused impersonated representatives of multinational companies and induced victims to pay for non-existent services.
How much money has the ED seized or attached in this case?
The ED seized valuables and froze bank accounts worth ₹2.35 crore and provisionally attached immovable property valued at ₹11.14 crore under PMLA, 2002, bringing total secured assets to over ₹13 crore against alleged proceeds of ₹20.35 crore.
How did the Kolkata fake call centre fraud work?
According to the ED, callers at VRM's premises used VoIP-based calls to contact foreign nationals, impersonating representatives of reputed multinationals. They threatened victims under false pretences and collected payments for fictitious services such as subscription cancellations and technical support, resulting in wrongful financial loss to multiple foreign nationals.
Who is Rajesh Goenka in this case?
Rajesh Goenka is the director of VRM Business Services Private Limited and has been named by the ED as the primary beneficiary of the proceeds of crime. He is accused of providing the infrastructure to operate the illegal call centre and directing the fraudulent scheme.
What triggered the ED investigation into VRM Business Services?
The ED initiated its PMLA investigation based on an FIR registered by the Electronics Complex Bidhannagar Police Station in Kolkata, following a complaint that Rajesh Goenka and associates were operating an unauthorised call centre and defrauding foreign nationals by impersonating service provider representatives.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 4 months ago
  2. 4 months ago
  3. 5 months ago
  4. 6 months ago
  5. 9 months ago
  6. 1 year ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google