ED files PMLA complaint in Assam Gramin Vikash Bank ₹7.28 crore fraud

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
ED files PMLA complaint in Assam Gramin Vikash Bank ₹7.28 crore fraud

Synopsis

The Enforcement Directorate has moved to prosecute a former branch head of Assam Gramin Vikash Bank for allegedly siphoning ₹7.28 crore through 20 unauthorised digital transactions, then layering the proceeds through tea-business accounts, self-help groups, and relatives' accounts — a case that exposes the vulnerability of rural banking software systems to insider fraud.

Key Takeaways

The Directorate of Enforcement filed a PMLA prosecution complaint before the Special Court in Guwahati on 19 May 2025 .
Accused: Dibyajyoti Kalita , former Branch Head of Assam Gramin Vikash Bank's Lahorijan branch , and Birbahu Brahma of Goalpara district .
Kalita allegedly misappropriated ₹7.28 crore via 20 unauthorised transactions using Finacle banking software between December 2020 and April 2021 .
Funds were allegedly routed through fictitious accounts, self-help groups, a tea-business partnership, and relatives' accounts.
The CBI filed a chargesheet on 29 April 2024 ; ED searches in November 2024 recovered documents, property papers, and a RuPay debit card .
Further investigation is ongoing.

The Directorate of Enforcement (ED) has filed a prosecution complaint under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) before the Special PMLA Court in Guwahati in connection with an alleged bank fraud and money laundering case involving ₹7.28 crore at the Assam Gramin Vikash Bank. The complaint, filed on Tuesday, 19 May, names Dibyajyoti Kalita, the then Branch Head of the bank's Lahorijan branch in Karbi Anglong district, and Birbahu Brahma, a resident of Goalpara district, as the accused.

How the Alleged Fraud Was Carried Out

According to the ED's investigation, between December 2020 and April 2021, Kalita allegedly misappropriated ₹7.28 crore from the Adjustment Clearing Account of the Lahorijan branch through 20 unauthorised transactions. Officials alleged that these transactions were executed using Finacle banking software credentials, without supporting vouchers or customer instructions — a method designed to evade routine audit trails.

The probe further revealed that the alleged proceeds of crime were layered through fictitious customer accounts, multiple self-help group and society accounts, as well as fabricated term deposits and loans against deposits — a multi-stage laundering structure that investigators say was designed to obscure the money trail.

Where the Money Allegedly Went

The ED claimed the funds were subsequently routed into the personal account of the principal accused, the account of Kalita's wife, a tea-business partnership concern, and several surrogate accounts operated in the names of relatives and associates of the second accused, Brahma. The use of a commercial enterprise — a tea business — as a layering vehicle is notable given Assam's dominant tea economy, which investigators say makes such structures harder to flag at first glance.

Searches, Seizures and Evidence

Searches conducted in November 2024 at the residences of the accused led to the seizure of incriminating documents, handwritten notebooks detailing investments, property papers, cheque books belonging to third parties, and a RuPay debit card allegedly linked to the principal accused. These physical records are expected to form a key part of the prosecution's evidence before the Special Court.

CBI Involvement and Legal Provisions

The ED's action follows a sequence of earlier proceedings. The case was originally registered at Khatkhati Police Station in Karbi Anglong under Sections 420 and 409 of the Indian Penal Code. It was subsequently re-registered by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Anti-Corruption Branch, Shillong. The CBI filed a chargesheet on 29 April 2024, invoking Section 120-B of the IPC and provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The ED's current prosecution complaint invokes Sections 44(1)(b) and 45(1) of the PMLA, 2002. Further investigation in the case is underway, officials said.

Point of View

Raising legitimate questions about detection lag in regional rural banks. Assam Gramin Vikash Bank, like many RRBs, operates in districts with limited audit oversight, making Finacle-credential misuse difficult to catch in real time. The tea-business layering angle deserves scrutiny: using a sector-specific commercial entity in Assam's dominant industry as a laundering vehicle is a pattern that financial intelligence units have flagged nationally. The real accountability question is systemic — not just who did it, but why the bank's internal controls did not flag 20 unauthorised transactions over five months.
NationPress
12 Aug 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Assam Gramin Vikash Bank PMLA case about?
The case involves the alleged misappropriation of ₹7.28 crore from the Adjustment Clearing Account of Assam Gramin Vikash Bank's Lahorijan branch in Karbi Anglong district. The Directorate of Enforcement has filed a PMLA prosecution complaint against former branch head Dibyajyoti Kalita and Birbahu Brahma of Goalpara district.
How was the alleged fraud carried out?
According to the ED, Kalita allegedly executed 20 unauthorised transactions between December 2020 and April 2021 using Finacle banking software credentials, without supporting vouchers or customer instructions. The proceeds were then layered through fictitious accounts, self-help groups, fabricated term deposits, and a tea-business partnership.
What role did the CBI play in this case?
The CBI's Anti-Corruption Branch in Shillong re-registered the case after it was initially filed at Khatkhati Police Station. The CBI filed a chargesheet on 29 April 2024, invoking Section 120-B of the IPC and provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The ED's PMLA action is parallel to and builds upon the CBI's proceedings.
What was recovered during the ED searches?
Searches at the accused's residences in November 2024 yielded incriminating documents, handwritten notebooks detailing investments, property papers, cheque books belonging to third parties, and a RuPay debit card allegedly linked to the principal accused.
What happens next in the case?
The prosecution complaint is now before the Special PMLA Court in Guwahati. The ED has stated that further investigation is ongoing, which may lead to additional accused or asset attachments as the money trail is traced further.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 week ago
  2. 1 month ago
  3. 2 months ago
  4. 2 months ago
  5. 3 months ago
  6. 8 months ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google