Why Did the ED Attach Properties of Prayag Group in a Money Laundering Case?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- ED action: Properties worth Rs 110 crore attached.
- Investigation basis: Initiated from CBI's FIR.
- Illegal deposits: Rs 2,863 crore raised from depositors.
- Business misuse: Funds diverted for Ponzi schemes.
- Directors involved: Basudeb Bagchi, Avik Bagchi, Swapna Bagchi.
Kolkata, Dec 22 (NationPress) The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has seized immovable assets worth a staggering Rs 110 crore in connection with a money laundering investigation involving the Prayag Group of Companies and its directors, as stated by the central investigation agency on Monday.
The seized assets include 450.42 acres of land and associated structures owned by Prayag Group companies, valued at around Rs 104 crore, spread across West Bengal, Bihar, and Assam. Additionally, properties worth Rs 6 crore belonging to directors Basudeb Bagchi, Avik Bagchi, and Swapna Bagchi have also been attached, according to the agency's statement.
The Kolkata zonal office executed the property attachment under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002, following a Provisional Attachment Order issued on December 15.
The ED's investigation was initiated based on the FIR and charge sheet filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), citing violations of sections of the IPC 1860 and the Prize Chits & Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978.
The FIR addresses extensive illegal deposit mobilization conducted by the Prayag Group through unauthorized deposit schemes.
According to findings from the ED, the Prayag Group, primarily through its subsidiaries Prayag Infotech Hi-Rise Ltd. and Prayag Infotech Network Pyt. Ltd., illicitly raised Rs 2,863 crore from 38,71,674 depositors by promising high returns via illegal deposit and money circulation schemes without any clearance from the RBI or SEBI. As of March 31, 2016, the dues owed to depositors, excluding interest, amounted to Rs 1,906 crore.
Further investigation revealed that the funds collected were not allocated for legitimate business purposes. Instead, the group operated a Ponzi-like scheme where funds from new investors were used to pay off earlier investors while a significant portion was diverted towards acquiring land, hotels, film city projects, acquiring companies, agent commissions, promotional advertisements, celebrity endorsements, and the personal enrichment of the promoters and their families.