Was a Fake ENO Manufacturing Unit Exposed in Delhi?

Click to start listening
Was a Fake ENO Manufacturing Unit Exposed in Delhi?

Synopsis

In a significant operation, Delhi Police have dismantled a fake ENO manufacturing unit in North Delhi's Ibrahimpur area, arresting two individuals. This crackdown not only protects consumers but also preserves the integrity of the original ENO brand. The investigation aims to uncover a larger counterfeit network.

Key Takeaways

  • Delhi Police successfully dismantled a fake ENO manufacturing unit.
  • Over 91,000 counterfeit sachets were seized during the operation.
  • Two individuals were arrested, highlighting the need for vigilance against counterfeit goods.
  • The operation was in response to a complaint from the original manufacturer, Glaxo Smith Kline.
  • Legal action has been initiated to address the counterfeit trade.

New Delhi, Oct 26 (NationPress) In a significant operation against counterfeit consumer goods, the Delhi Police have dismantled an illicit ENO production facility in the Ibrahimpur neighborhood of North Delhi, leading to the arrest of two individuals linked to this operation.

The police team successfully recovered a substantial quantity of fake ENO products, along with packaging materials and machinery utilized in this unlawful activity.

According to reports from the NR-I Crime Branch, the raid was executed based on a tip-off from Glaxo Smith Kline Pharmaceuticals Ltd., the legitimate manufacturer of ENO, as stated by the Delhi Police on Sunday.

Upon receiving detailed intel, the team stormed the site and discovered a fully operational fake ENO production unit, which was meticulously imitating the brand's packaging and production methods.

During the raid, authorities confiscated 91,257 sachets of counterfeit ENO, 80 kilograms of raw materials, 13.080 kilograms of printed rolls, 54,780 stickers, and 2,100 unfilled ENO-branded packets.

Additionally, a machine employed for filling and packaging sachets was found on-site.

The individuals arrested have been identified as Sandeep Jain (45), the proprietor of the fake production unit, and Jitender alias Chotu (23), who was operating the packaging machinery, both hailing from Ibrahimpur.

Jain, who has completed education up to the 8th grade, had leased the premises to create a counterfeit production facility, while Jitender, an illiterate laborer from Sitapur district in Uttar Pradesh, was assisting in the manufacturing process.

A case has been filed under sections 318(4)/336(4)/274/275 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and 103/104 of the Trade Marks Act at the Crime Branch police station.

The accused are currently in police custody for two days as investigations continue to identify other associates in the network and trace the supply chain.

Deputy Commissioner of Police (Crime-IV) Pankaj Kumar, IPS, remarked that this operation has thwarted the widespread distribution of adulterated and counterfeit health products, thereby safeguarding consumers and the legitimate rights of the original manufacturer.

Further investigations are ongoing to uncover the broader network behind this illegal trade.

Point of View

This incident highlights the ongoing battle against counterfeit products in India. The swift action taken by the Delhi Police not only protects consumers but also reinforces the importance of brand integrity and consumer trust. As we continue to face the challenges of counterfeit goods, it is vital for authorities to remain vigilant and proactive in their efforts.
NationPress
26/10/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What led to the discovery of the fake ENO manufacturing unit?
The discovery was made following a complaint from Glaxo Smith Kline Pharmaceuticals Ltd., the original manufacturer of ENO, prompting an investigation by the NR-I Crime Branch.
What items were seized during the raid?
Authorities seized 91,257 counterfeit ENO sachets, 80 kilograms of raw materials, printing rolls, stickers, and a machine used for packaging.
Who were the individuals arrested in this operation?
The arrested individuals are Sandeep Jain, the owner of the manufacturing unit, and Jitender alias Chotu, who operated the packaging machine.
What legal actions have been taken against the accused?
A case has been registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Trade Marks Act.
What is the significance of this operation?
This operation is significant as it aims to prevent the distribution of counterfeit health products, thereby protecting consumers and the rights of legitimate manufacturers.
Nation Press