FSSAI issues 9 notices to Swiggy Instamart over expired, unsafe food complaints

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
FSSAI issues 9 notices to Swiggy Instamart over expired, unsafe food complaints

Synopsis

FSSAI has hit Swiggy Instamart with nine notices after consumers reported receiving expired protein supplements, rotten eggs, spoiled parathas, and — most alarmingly — a deteriorated infant food formula that was allegedly re-supplied even after being returned. The regulator has demanded a full compliance report, with legal action under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 on the table if Swiggy fails to respond adequately.

Key Takeaways

FSSAI issued nine notices to Swiggy Instamart on 11 July over consumer complaints of unsafe food supply.
Alleged violations include delivery of expired, spoiled, rotten, and contaminated food products.
An infant food formulation in deteriorated condition was reportedly re-supplied to a consumer after the defective item was returned.
Products cited include Healthify Whey Protein , Noice Madras Mixture , Akshayakalpa Organic Egg , and Kakke da Paratha .
Swiggy Instamart has been directed to submit a detailed compliance report within a stipulated period or face action under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 .
The FBO was also flagged for marketing eggs under a brand not covered by its existing FSSAI licence .

The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) has issued nine notices to Swiggy Instamart following consumer complaints alleging the supply of expired, spoiled, contaminated, and otherwise unsafe food products through the quick commerce platform. The regulator confirmed the action on Saturday, 11 July, citing multiple violations across product categories.

Key Violations Flagged

Among the central concerns, FSSAI noted that eggs were allegedly being marketed under a brand name not covered by the product categories approved in Swiggy Instamart's existing FSSAI licence. The Food Business Operator (FBO) was directed to immediately halt marketing of the product unless it falls under a valid licence, and to apply for a licence modification if necessary.

Complaints also alleged that 'Healthify 100 per cent Whey Protein 1 kg' and 'Noice Homestyle Madras Mixture with Peanuts' were delivered to consumers after their respective expiry dates — a direct violation of food safety norms.

Spoiled and Contaminated Products Reported

In one instance, an 'Akshayakalpa Organic Egg' was reportedly found expired, rotten, emitting a foul odour, and showing visible signs of contamination, rendering it unfit for human consumption. Similarly, Kakke da Paratha was reportedly found spoiled and foul-smelling, also deemed unfit for consumption.

In a particularly concerning case, an infant food formulation was found in a deteriorated and unsafe condition — and was allegedly re-supplied to the consumer even after the defective product had been returned. FSSAI noted that no corrective action was taken by the FBO despite the complaint being escalated through the appropriate channels.

What the Regulator Has Demanded

FSSAI has directed Swiggy Instamart to submit a detailed explanation addressing all alleged non-compliances and the circumstances that led to the reported incidents. The company has also been asked to provide specifics of its food safety systems, quality assurance protocols, corrective actions already undertaken, and steps being taken to prevent recurrence.

The regulator has set a stipulated deadline for the compliance report. Failure to respond adequately may invite action under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006.

Broader Context and What It Means

This action comes amid growing regulatory scrutiny of India's booming quick commerce sector, where the pressure to deliver groceries and perishables within minutes has raised persistent questions about storage standards and supply chain oversight. FSSAI's move against Swiggy Instamart is one of the more visible enforcement actions against a major quick commerce player and signals that the regulator is treating consumer complaints as a credible enforcement trigger rather than a procedural formality.

Notably, the alleged re-supply of a defective infant food product — a category held to the highest safety standards under Indian food law — is likely to attract the most regulatory attention going forward. How Swiggy Instamart responds to the notices, and whether the regulator escalates to penalties or licence action, will be closely watched across the quick commerce industry.

Point of View

Which have expanded at breakneck speed, cannot outsource food safety accountability to their supply chains. The re-supply of a defective infant formula is the detail that should alarm policymakers most: it suggests a complaint-resolution process that failed at every checkpoint. The deeper structural question is whether 10-minute delivery windows are compatible with the cold-chain and quality-check requirements that perishable and infant-category products legally demand. If FSSAI stops at notices without following through on penalties or licence review, this episode will be remembered as a missed enforcement moment.
NationPress
11 Jul 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did FSSAI issue notices to Swiggy Instamart?
FSSAI issued nine notices to Swiggy Instamart following consumer complaints alleging the supply of expired, spoiled, contaminated, and otherwise unsafe food products through the quick commerce platform. The regulator also flagged a licencing violation related to the marketing of eggs under an unapproved brand category.
Which products were flagged in the FSSAI notices?
The notices cited complaints involving 'Healthify 100 per cent Whey Protein 1 kg', 'Noice Homestyle Madras Mixture with Peanuts', 'Akshayakalpa Organic Egg', and 'Kakke da Paratha', all of which were allegedly supplied in expired, spoiled, or contaminated condition. An infant food formulation in deteriorated condition was also flagged.
What is the most serious allegation against Swiggy Instamart?
Among the most serious allegations is that an infant food formulation found in a deteriorated and unsafe condition was re-supplied to the consumer even after the defective product had been returned. Infant food products are held to the highest safety standards under Indian food law.
What action can FSSAI take if Swiggy Instamart does not comply?
If Swiggy Instamart fails to submit a satisfactory explanation and compliance report within the stipulated period, FSSAI may initiate appropriate legal action under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. This could include penalties or licence-related proceedings.
What has FSSAI asked Swiggy Instamart to submit?
FSSAI has directed Swiggy Instamart to provide a detailed explanation covering the alleged non-compliances, the circumstances leading to the incidents, its food safety systems, quality assurance measures, corrective actions taken, and steps to prevent recurrence — all within a stipulated deadline.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 week ago
  2. 3 weeks ago
  3. 3 months ago
  4. 4 months ago
  5. 6 months ago
  6. 6 months ago
  7. 11 months ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google