Gujarat invokes black marketing law against 4 in fake fertiliser racket

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Gujarat invokes black marketing law against 4 in fake fertiliser racket

Synopsis

Gujarat has weaponised a rarely-invoked black marketing law — the PBM Act, 1980 — to jail four men caught selling fake IFFCO-branded DAP fertiliser to farmers in Amreli. With 98 dealer licences already cancelled this year and the minister signalling a statewide sweep, this is the sharpest escalation yet in India's fight against spurious agricultural inputs.

Key Takeaways

The Gujarat government invoked the PBM Act, 1980 against four accused on 6 July for selling counterfeit and substandard fertilisers in Amreli district .
Officials recovered 299 bags of low-quality DAP fertiliser in counterfeit IFFCO -branded packaging; all three lab samples failed quality standards.
The four accused — Mahesh Japadiya , Jignesh Dabhi , Vijay Malviya , and Bharat Dhanani — have been detained and sent to jail.
Agriculture Minister Jitu Vaghani said repeat offenders will face imprisonment in addition to licence cancellation under the PBM Act.
During the current year, licences of 98 dealers — including 68 fertiliser , 17 seed , and 13 pesticide dealers — have been suspended or cancelled.
The government has warned of statewide investigations wherever similar complaints arise.

The Gujarat government has invoked the Prevention of Black Marketing and Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities (PBM) Act, 1980, against four accused found selling counterfeit and substandard fertilisers in Amreli district, with Agriculture Minister Jitu Vaghani warning on Monday, 6 July that repeat offenders in fake fertiliser and seed trade will face imprisonment alongside licence cancellation. All four have been detained and sent to jail following a state investigation.

The Fraud at the Centre of the Case

The crackdown traces back to an inspection of Shree Fertiliser in Khambhala village, Babra taluka, Amreli district, where officials recovered 299 bags of low-quality DAP fertiliser packed in counterfeit bags bearing the branding of IFFCO — one of India's most trusted fertiliser cooperatives. Three samples sent to the Junagadh laboratory for testing failed quality standards across the board. Investigators found no purchase invoice, no source certificate, and no corresponding stock register entry for the recovered material.

Who the Four Accused Are

Mahesh Japadiya, 33, of Jasdan, Rajkot district, was allegedly linked to the recovered stock and had reportedly purchased the fertiliser from a second accused. Jignesh Dabhi, 26, of Rampara village, Botad district, is alleged to have sold extremely low-quality fertiliser in counterfeit IFFCO-branded bags, passing it off as genuine subsidised DAP to farmers.

Vijay Malviya, 30, of Surat, is accused of conspiring with others to sell substandard fake DAP in counterfeit packaging carrying the branding of reputed companies, including IFFCO, while presenting it as genuine subsidised fertiliser. Bharat Dhanani, 39, of Amreli district, allegedly printed the counterfeit plastic bags — including those bearing the branding of IFFCO and the Pradhan Mantri Bharatiya Jan Urvarak Pariyojana (Bharat DAP). A search of his warehouse at Mota Ankadiya village led to the seizure of large quantities of substandard fertilisers, empty bags, packing machinery, and other materials worth several lakh rupees, according to officials.

What the Government Said

'We had already made it clear that the government under the leadership of Chief Minister Bhupendra Patel will not tolerate anyone cheating farmers. Those selling illegal, prohibited or substandard agricultural inputs will not only face cancellation of their licences, but repeat offenders will also be prosecuted under the PBM Act and sent to jail,' Vaghani said.

The minister described the action as only the beginning of a wider crackdown, adding that investigations would be launched in other districts wherever similar complaints are received. He also warned that no dealer found involved in black marketing or counterfeit agricultural products would receive any leniency.

Scale of the Wider Crackdown

Vaghani disclosed that during the current year, the licences of 98 dealers had already been suspended or cancelled for irregularities — comprising 68 fertiliser dealers, 17 seed dealers, and 13 pesticide dealers. This comes amid growing concerns across Indian states about the infiltration of spurious agricultural inputs into rural supply chains, which directly erodes farm productivity and household incomes. Notably, the use of the PBM Act — typically reserved for essential commodities hoarding — signals a deliberate escalation in legal severity beyond routine licence action.

What Happens Next

Vaghani assured farmers that the state government remains committed to protecting their interests and that the campaign against those causing financial losses through counterfeit agricultural inputs will continue. The government has indicated that all districts are now under scrutiny, and further cases under the PBM Act are expected if investigations uncover repeat offenders elsewhere.

Point of View

Not routine enforcement. The fact that 98 dealer licences have already been cancelled this year suggests the problem is systemic, not isolated. Yet licence cancellations alone clearly failed to deter the trade, which is precisely why the threat of imprisonment matters. The deeper question is supply-chain integrity: counterfeit bags replicating IFFCO and Bharat DAP branding point to an organised printing and distribution network that a single district crackdown will not dismantle. A credible deterrent requires tracing the supply chain upstream — not just catching the last-mile sellers.
NationPress
6 Jul 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the PBM Act and why has Gujarat invoked it against fertiliser sellers?
The Prevention of Black Marketing and Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities (PBM) Act, 1980 allows authorities to detain individuals who engage in black marketing of essential commodities, including agricultural inputs. Gujarat invoked it against four accused to impose imprisonment on top of licence cancellation, signalling a tougher stance against repeat offenders in the fake fertiliser trade.
What exactly was seized in the Amreli fertiliser fraud case?
Officials recovered 299 bags of low-quality DAP fertiliser packed in counterfeit IFFCO-branded bags from Shree Fertiliser in Khambhala village, Amreli district. Three samples sent to the Junagadh laboratory all failed quality standards, and investigators found no purchase invoice, source certificate, or stock register entry for the material.
Who are the four accused in the Gujarat fake fertiliser case?
The four accused are Mahesh Japadiya (33) of Jasdan, Rajkot district; Jignesh Dabhi (26) of Rampara village, Botad district; Vijay Malviya (30) of Surat; and Bharat Dhanani (39) of Amreli district. Dhanani is alleged to have printed the counterfeit bags, while the others are accused of distributing and selling the substandard fertiliser.
How many dealer licences has Gujarat cancelled in the current year for agricultural input irregularities?
According to Agriculture Minister Jitu Vaghani, 98 dealer licences have been suspended or cancelled during the current year — 68 fertiliser dealers, 17 seed dealers, and 13 pesticide dealers — for various irregularities.
What does this crackdown mean for farmers in Gujarat?
The crackdown is aimed at ensuring farmers receive genuine, high-quality agricultural inputs. Counterfeit or substandard fertilisers can damage crops and cause significant financial losses. The government has promised statewide investigations and said the campaign will continue until the supply of spurious inputs is eliminated.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 week ago
  2. 2 weeks ago
  3. 3 weeks ago
  4. 4 weeks ago
  5. 2 months ago
  6. 4 months ago
  7. 11 months ago
  8. 11 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google