Why Did the High Court Deny Relief to Cricketer Yash Dayal in Minor's Rape Case?

Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- The Rajasthan High Court has denied a stay on Yash Dayal's arrest.
- The case involves serious allegations of rape against a minor.
- Next hearing is scheduled for August 22.
- The defense claims a conspiracy to defame the cricketer.
- Yash Dayal has previously faced controversies regarding his social media posts.
Jaipur, Aug 6 (NationPress) The Rajasthan High Court has denied a stay on the arrest of cricketer Yash Dayal, a fast bowler for the Indian Premier League (IPL) team Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB), in connection with a case concerning the alleged rape of a minor girl.
The court emphasized that due to the victim's status as a minor, no interim relief could be offered to the accused cricketer.
Justice Sudesh Bansal, overseeing the proceedings in Jaipur, also called for the case diary and scheduled the next hearing for August 22.
During the court session, Yash Dayal's attorney, Kunal Jaiman, contended that the matter was part of a broader scheme aimed at tarnishing the cricketer's reputation.
He noted that a similar rape allegation had previously been lodged in Ghaziabad, which the Allahabad High Court had temporarily halted.
"Just seven days post that, another FIR was filed in Jaipur. It appears a group may be collaborating to extort by initiating such cases," Yash Dayal's attorney asserted.
In contrast, Sanganer police station officer Anil Jaiman provided insights regarding the Jaipur case, revealing that the complainant, a minor at the time of the incident, met Yash Dayal during a cricket event.
She later accused him of sexually assaulting her approximately two years ago under the guise of assisting her in pursuing a cricket career.
The police also stated that Yash Dayal allegedly raped the girl again in a hotel in Sitapura, Jaipur, during the IPL 2025 season after inviting her to his room.
As the girl was 17 years old during the initial incident, an FIR has been filed under applicable Sections of the IPC and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.
It is worth noting that Dayal previously stirred controversy for allegedly sharing communal content on his Instagram account two years prior. He later clarified that while two contentious stories were posted from his account, he did not personally share them.