Is Trinamool Replicating Congress' Authoritarian Legacy from the 1975 Emergency?

Click to start listening
Is Trinamool Replicating Congress' Authoritarian Legacy from the 1975 Emergency?

Synopsis

In a bold statement, BJP's Amit Malviya draws parallels between the Trinamool Congress and Congress' authoritarian past. As debates around the Emergency of 1975 resurface, Malviya's claims provoke critical dialogue about governance and democracy in India today. Explore the implications of this comparison and the call for remembrance of the past.

Key Takeaways

  • Trinamool Congress is criticized for its authoritarian tendencies.
  • A comparison is drawn between TMC and Congress' past actions.
  • Sagarika Ghose's statements are highlighted as controversial.
  • The importance of remembering past dictatorial actions is emphasized.
  • Mamata Banerjee's stance against the observance of 'Samvidhaan Hatya Diwas' raises questions about democracy.

Kolkata, June 25 (NationPress) BJP leader Amit Malviya has charged that the Trinamool Congress exhibits a similar “dynasty-driven, authoritarian mindset” as the Congress party, which played a pivotal role in imposing the Emergency in India back in 1975.

This assertion came following a recent statement made by former journalist and Trinamool Congress Rajya Sabha member Sagarika Ghose, who indirectly defended the Emergency, claiming it was a response to the chaos allegedly instigated by the RSS.

Malviya remarked, “TMC MP Sagarika Ghose’s rationale for the Emergency is unsurprising. TMC is merely a brutal extension of the same authoritarian mindset that imposed the Emergency in 1975—one that fears dissent and flourishes on compliance.” He expressed this sentiment in a post on his official X account on Wednesday.

He further accused Ghose of intentionally omitting significant events from the Emergency era, asserting that her silence encompasses the suspension of democracy and the violation of civil liberties that followed former Prime Minister Indira Gandhi's declaration of an emergency on June 25, 1975.

Malviya pointed out other crucial developments that Ghose failed to address, including the detention of RSS chief Balasaheb Deoras and prominent BJP figures like former Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee and ex-Union Home Minister L.K. Advani.

He noted, “On July 4, 1975, the RSS was officially banned. Of the 130,000 Satyagrahis arrested, over 100,000 were from the RSS. Among the 30,000 detained under MISA, 25,000 were Sangh Karyakartas. A young Narendra Modi was working underground, rallying resistance nationwide.”

According to Malviya, it was foreseeable that a Trinamool Congress member would defend such “tyranny,” especially given that Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee once labeled a university student a Maoist for asking questions.

He stated, “Tyranny is ingrained in their nature. They cannot comprehend sacrifice because their politics is founded on blind allegiance and inherited power. The Emergency was not merely a Congress offense; it is a mindset that TMC embraces with pride.”

Leader of the Opposition in the West Bengal Assembly, Suvendu Adhikari, also made a statement this morning, advocating for the observation of June 25 annually as “Samvidhaan Hatya Diwas” to remind Indians of the dangers of dictatorship stemming from that Emergency.

Earlier this month, Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee told the media that the state would not observe “Samvidhaan Hatya Diwas” on June 25, as mandated by the Union government.

Responding to the Centre’s directive to various state governments regarding the observance of June 25 as ‘Samvidhaan Hatya Diwas’, the Chief Minister described the central government’s decision as a “mockery” of democracy and the Indian Constitution.

She questioned, “Does the current Union government uphold democratic principles? Is genuine democracy present in the country today? Therefore, ‘Samvidhaan Hatya Diwas’ will not be commemorated in West Bengal.”

Point of View

It's essential to analyze Malviya's claims critically. While historical comparisons can inform current political discourse, they should be approached with caution. The implications of such statements can polarize public opinion and detract from constructive dialogue about democracy and governance in contemporary India.
NationPress
25/06/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What did Amit Malviya accuse Trinamool Congress of?
Amit Malviya accused Trinamool Congress of having a similar authoritarian mindset to that of Congress, which led to the imposition of the Emergency in 1975.
Who is Sagarika Ghose?
Sagarika Ghose is a member of Trinamool Congress and a former journalist who recently made statements regarding the justification of the Emergency.
What was the Emergency in India?
The Emergency was a 21-month period from 1975 to 1977 when Prime Minister Indira Gandhi ruled by decree, suspending elections and civil liberties.
What does 'Samvidhaan Hatya Diwas' mean?
'Samvidhaan Hatya Diwas' translates to 'Constitutional Murder Day,' commemorating the imposition of the Emergency and its impact on democracy in India.
Why did Mamata Banerjee refuse to observe 'Samvidhaan Hatya Diwas'?
Mamata Banerjee stated that observing 'Samvidhaan Hatya Diwas' would be a mockery of democracy and indicated that the current Union government's actions do not respect democratic norms.