J&K terror: ISI directing LeT to pass off attacks as ISKP operations

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
J&K terror: ISI directing LeT to pass off attacks as ISKP operations

Synopsis

Pakistan's ISI has reportedly ordered Lashkar-e-Taiba to keep carrying out attacks in Jammu and Kashmir — but to let the ISKP take the credit. The strategy hands Islamabad plausible deniability, buries India's existing intelligence on LeT cadres under a far murkier ISKP trail, and mirrors a LeT-Islamic State partnership already active in Balochistan. Indian agencies say they have seen through the playbook.

Key Takeaways

The ISI has instructed Lashkar-e-Taiba to conduct attacks in Jammu and Kashmir while attributing them to the ISKP , according to intelligence officials.
The shift ends the practice of The Resistance Front (TRF) claiming strikes, replacing it with ISKP branding to create operational deniability for Pakistan.
The ISKP has a limited ground presence in J&K and has focused mainly on online radicalisation ; the new arrangement boosts its profile without requiring direct operations.
A LeT-ISKP joint operational relationship already exists in Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa , making the Kashmir extension of this partnership a logical step.
Lashkar has moved training facilities to the Pakistan-Afghanistan border area after its Muridke base near Lahore was destroyed.
The ISI is also working to build home-grown modules and a new overground worker (OGW) network in J&K using individuals without police records.

Indian security agencies have uncovered a fresh strategy by Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) to obscure the origins of terror attacks in Jammu and Kashmir: directing Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) operatives to carry out strikes while attributing responsibility to the Islamic State Khorasan Province (ISKP). The shift, according to intelligence officials, follows two back-to-back terror attacks in the Union Territory that have renewed concerns about a possible resurgence of militancy.

The New Attribution Strategy

Until recently, LeT's proxy outfit The Resistance Front (TRF) had been claiming responsibility for attacks in J&K. According to an Intelligence Bureau official, the ISI has now instructed affiliated groups to stop claiming strikes under the TRF banner. Instead, attacks carried out by Lashkar operatives will be attributed to the ISKP — a group with a comparatively limited documented ground presence in the region.

'The ISI has decided that while Lashkar would carry out the attacks, responsibility for every strike or terror activity would be attributed to the ISKP,' the official said.

This rebranding serves a dual purpose, according to officials: it gives the LeT and ISI operational deniability, and it complicates the task of Indian investigating agencies, which hold extensive data on Lashkar and TRF cadres but have far less intelligence on ISKP networks in J&K.

ISKP's Role: Publicity Over Ground Operations

Officials note that the ISKP has so far focused primarily on online radicalisation in Jammu and Kashmir rather than ground-level operations. The outfit reportedly prefers fostering a radicalised environment against India rather than direct kinetic activity.

Significantly, the ISI has reportedly been reluctant to give the ISKP a full operational mandate in J&K, fearing that doing so could alienate established groups — Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM), Lashkar-e-Taiba, and Hizbul Mujahideen — whose cooperation it still depends on. Nevertheless, officials say the ISKP stands to gain from the arrangement: being credited for attacks would amplify its online radicalisation campaign and elevate its perceived strength in the region.

The Balochistan Connection

The LeT-ISKP convergence in J&K mirrors a pattern already visible in Pakistan's western provinces. Facing severe losses at the hands of the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA) and the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), Pakistani security forces reportedly turned to both the LeT and the Islamic State to bolster their position in Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP). Officials say the two groups have since been conducting joint operations, making their coordination on a Kashmir strategy a natural extension of an already-established working relationship.

Notably, since the destruction of Lashkar's primary training facility in Muridke, near Lahore, the group has relocated a significant portion of its training infrastructure to areas close to the Pakistan-Afghanistan border, where joint drills with ISKP operatives are reportedly ongoing.

Rebuilding Networks in J&K

Beyond the attribution strategy, intelligence officials say the ISI is pursuing a broader effort to rebuild its footprint in Jammu and Kashmir. This includes attempts to establish home-grown modules within the Union Territory and to recruit a fresh network of overground workers (OGWs) — individuals without existing police records — who can operate without immediate detection.

Indian security agencies, however, say they remain confident the recent attacks do not signal a sustained resurgence and have vowed to counter any revival of militancy. The unmasking of the ISI's latest attribution playbook, officials suggest, is itself a step toward neutralising it.

Point of View

Which carries a global jihadist imprimatur that the TRF never did. If this strategy takes hold, India faces a dual problem: its well-mapped intelligence on LeT becomes less actionable, while the ISKP's inflated profile in J&K could attract genuinely radicalised recruits who have no prior affiliation with Pakistani state proxies. The Balochistan precedent also matters — once the ISI normalises operational fusion between the LeT and the Islamic State, the line between state-directed and ideologically autonomous terrorism blurs in ways that complicate both legal prosecution and diplomatic pressure on Islamabad.
NationPress
6 Aug 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the ISI's new strategy for terror attacks in Jammu and Kashmir?
According to intelligence officials, the ISI has directed Lashkar-e-Taiba operatives to continue carrying out attacks in J&K but to have them claimed by the Islamic State Khorasan Province (ISKP). This gives Pakistan plausible deniability and makes it harder for Indian agencies to attribute attacks to their known LeT networks.
Why is the ISKP being used as a cover for Lashkar operations?
Indian agencies hold extensive data on Lashkar-e-Taiba and TRF cadres, but comparatively little on ISKP networks in J&K. By routing attribution through the ISKP, the ISI complicates Indian investigations and shields LeT from direct accountability. The ISKP also benefits by gaining a higher profile for its online radicalisation campaign.
Does the ISKP have a significant presence in Jammu and Kashmir?
No — officials say the ISKP currently has a very limited ground presence in J&K and has focused primarily on online radicalisation rather than direct operations. The ISI has also been cautious about giving it a full operational role, reportedly to avoid upsetting established groups like JeM, LeT, and Hizbul Mujahideen.
How are Lashkar-e-Taiba and ISKP already connected?
The two groups have reportedly been conducting joint operations in Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, where Pakistani security forces enlisted them to counter losses inflicted by the BLA and TTP. Lashkar has also shifted training facilities to the Pakistan-Afghanistan border area, where joint drills with ISKP operatives are said to be ongoing.
What other steps is the ISI taking to rebuild its network in J&K?
Beyond the attribution strategy, intelligence officials say the ISI is attempting to establish home-grown militant modules within J&K and recruit a fresh network of overground workers (OGWs) — individuals without existing police records — to support future operations without immediate detection.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 2 months ago
  2. 2 months ago
  3. 4 months ago
  4. 6 months ago
  5. 6 months ago
  6. 7 months ago
  7. 10 months ago
  8. 10 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google