Jaishankar on Rubio Mumbai meet: 'Indira Gandhi went to Shimla to meet Bhutto'
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar on Thursday, 22 October said he had 'failed' to understand the reasoning behind opposition criticism of India hosting US Secretary of State Marco Rubio in Mumbai, pushing back sharply against Congress leader Rahul Gandhi's characterisation of the meeting as a 'summoning.'
Jaishankar's Sharp Rebuttal
Speaking at the NDTV World Summit, Jaishankar deflected the criticism with pointed sarcasm. 'I didn't get that. They don't like Mumbai? I mean, they have something against Mumbai? I think it is a great city, it is our financial capital. It is our Bollywood capital. It has got so much going for it. Maybe Mumbai doesn't like them... I have no idea why they have this reservation,' he said, drawing applause from the audience.
The minister's remarks came days after Rahul Gandhi took a swipe at the Narendra Modi-led government over the choice of venue for the bilateral engagement with Rubio, framing it as India being 'summoned' to meet a foreign counterpart outside the national capital.
Historical Precedents Cited
Jaishankar was direct in invoking historical precedents to counter the criticism. 'If going out of Delhi to meet a foreign leader or a foreign counterpart is summoning, I can give you a lot of examples. Mrs (Indira) Gandhi went to Shimla to meet Bhutto. Was she summoned? Salman Khurshid went to Jaipur to meet a Pakistan PM. Was he summoned?' he said.
'We are adults, let's have an adult conversation,' he added, before the gathering responded with another round of applause. The reference to the Shimla Agreement of 1972 — a landmark diplomatic summit between then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi and Pakistani leader Zulfikar Ali Bhutto — was a deliberate invocation of Congress-era diplomacy to blunt the opposition's argument.
The Mumbai Bilateral Meetings
Jaishankar had hosted counterparts from the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and the United States in Mumbai on 19–20 October. He also attended celebrations marking the 250th anniversary of US independence as Guest of Honour during that visit.
Notably, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) had already addressed the controversy the previous week. Spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal, at a bi-weekly media briefing in New Delhi, stated: 'It has been the practice for the last decade or so that we have hosted foreign dignitaries outside Delhi.' Jaiswal cited multiple examples, including Prime Minister Modi hosting the Prime Minister of Spain in Baroda, Chancellor Merz in Ahmedabad, and the Prime Minister of Mauritius in Varanasi. He also noted that the SCO Foreign Ministers Meeting was hosted in Goa, and the Heart of Asia Conference was held in Amritsar.
The Broader Context
The exchange reflects a broader pattern of political contestation over India's foreign policy conduct. The opposition's 'summoning' framing taps into a nationalist anxiety around diplomatic optics, while the government's counter-narrative positions India's decentralised diplomatic hosting as a mark of confidence rather than deference. This is not the first time Jaishankar has been drawn into a direct public rebuttal of Congress foreign policy critiques — the minister has repeatedly used media forums to defend India's diplomatic posture.
With India-US ties entering a consequential phase on trade and security, the optics of where senior officials meet is unlikely to remain a sustained point of controversy, but Thursday's exchange underscores how foreign policy has become an arena of domestic political competition.