Can the Judiciary Solve Delhi-NCR's Pollution Crisis?

Click to start listening
Can the Judiciary Solve Delhi-NCR's Pollution Crisis?

Synopsis

In a recent session, the Supreme Court of India emphasized its limitations in addressing the severe pollution crisis in Delhi-NCR. Chief Justice Surya Kant highlighted the complexity of the problem, urging for expert insights while announcing a commitment to ongoing monitoring and action.

Key Takeaways

  • Judiciary limitations in solving pollution issues.
  • Need for expert assessments to tackle air quality.
  • Continuous monitoring of pollution levels is essential.
  • Personal health impacts highlighted by judicial members.
  • Children's vulnerability necessitates urgent action.

New Delhi, Nov 27 (NationPress) The Supreme Court expressed on Thursday that it cannot be relied upon to offer instantaneous remedies to the perilous air quality in Delhi-NCR.

During the discussion, senior advocate Aparajita Singh, serving as amicus curiae for the court, brought up the Public Interest Litigation (PIL) related to air-pollution management in the capital. Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant questioned: “What sort of magic wand can a judicial body wield? This air quality is alarming for Delhi-NCR. What directives can we issue for immediate clean air?”

While acknowledging the dire circumstances, CJI Kant warned against the misconception that the court’s orders alone could instantaneously improve air quality. He agreed to schedule the long-standing MC Mehta case for December 1.

Recognizing the amicus’ comments about the “disturbing situation” in Delhi-NCR, CJI Kant pointed out that the causes behind the capital’s air pollution are multifaceted.

“We are all aware of the issue. We must pinpoint all the factors. Thinking there is a single cause would be erroneous,” he stated, emphasizing that “only experts and scientists” can provide a thorough analysis of pollution sources and tailor-made solutions.

Furthermore, CJI Kant highlighted the recurrent nature of severe pollution during the winter months. “This issue is only brought up ceremonially during the Diwali period. After winter, it vanishes. We need consistent monitoring,” he stated, assuring that the Supreme Court would take up this issue “on an ongoing basis.”

“Let’s plan for this on Monday (December 1), and evaluate what actions we can take,” he added.

Earlier this month, the Supreme Court had requested the Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM) to contemplate delaying school sports events scheduled for November and December, noting that “children are particularly vulnerable.”

In a separate hearing on Wednesday, CJI Kant shared his personal struggle to complete his morning walk due to the poor air quality.

“Walking is my only form of exercise. Even that has become challenging. I walked for 55 minutes yesterday and faced issues until morning,”

he commented in response to another advocate’s plea for exemption from physical court appearances due to the air quality.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal additionally informed the court that he had completely stopped his walks. “Breathing this toxic air… at our age…,” Sibal remarked, observing that the Air Quality Index (AQI) remains alarmingly high even during the evenings.

The dangerous conditions led Justice P.S. Narasimha to previously suggest that lawyers consider virtual appearances to avoid “lasting harm” from the prevailing pollution.

“This situation is extremely dire! Why are you all here in person?” Justice Narasimha urged, encouraging advocates to utilize the virtual hearing option.

Point of View

It is essential to acknowledge that while the judiciary plays a critical role in addressing public health concerns, the complexity of environmental issues like air quality requires a collaborative effort involving scientists, policymakers, and the community. The ongoing discourse must focus on sustainable solutions rather than temporary fixes, ensuring a healthier future for all.
NationPress
27/11/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the Supreme Court say about pollution in Delhi-NCR?
The Supreme Court stated that it cannot provide miraculous solutions to the pollution crisis in Delhi-NCR, emphasizing the need for expert assessments.
Why is the air quality crisis in Delhi-NCR concerning?
The air quality crisis poses significant health risks, especially to vulnerable populations like children and the elderly, prompting urgent action.
What actions did CJI Kant propose?
CJI Kant proposed ongoing monitoring and the listing of the MC Mehta case to explore long-term solutions for air pollution.
What did the CJI say about personal experiences with air quality?
CJI Kant shared his own difficulties in exercising due to poor air quality, highlighting the widespread impact on daily life.
What is the role of the Commission for Air Quality Management?
The CAQM is responsible for implementing strategies to manage and improve air quality across the national capital region.
Nation Press