Why is the Kerala HC ordering the government to release Ciza Thomas's retirement benefits?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a significant ruling, the Kerala High Court has demanded that the Vijayan government promptly release the retirement and pensionary benefits for Ciza Thomas, former Vice Chancellor of KTU. This case highlights ongoing tensions between state officials and raises questions about the timely disbursement of benefits for retired officials.
Key Takeaways
- The Kerala High Court demands timely disbursement of retirement benefits.
- Ciza Thomas is entangled in a significant administrative controversy.
- Disciplinary actions against retiring officials raise important questions.
- The ruling emphasizes the importance of financial justice for retired officials.
- Educational governance in Kerala is under scrutiny amidst political tensions.
Kochi, May 30 (NationPress) The Kerala High Court has instructed the Vijayan administration to release the retirement and pensionary benefits of Ciza Thomas, the former Vice Chancellor of Kerala Technological University (KTU), within a two-week timeframe.
A division bench led by Justice Mustaq Mohammed mandated that the Pinarayi Vijayan government expedite the disbursement of the retirement and pensionary benefits for Ciza Thomas, who faced disciplinary measures the very day she retired as Vice Chancellor of KTU on March 31, 2023.
Currently, Thomas holds the position of Vice Chancellor at the Kerala University of Digital Sciences, Innovation and Technology.
Issues arose for Thomas in November 2022, when she assumed additional responsibilities as the Vice Chancellor of KTU under the orders of then-Chancellor Governor Arif Mohammed Khan, while serving as the senior joint director at the Technical Education Department.
At that time, a significant conflict existed between the then-Governor Khan and Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan.
The bench criticized the state government for its failure to ensure the release of retirement and pensionary benefits to Thomas.
Previously, a single bench of the Kerala High Court had expressed strong discontent with the Sankaracharya University for refusing a fellowship to a research student.
The Court highlighted that if the Vice Chancellor of the University receives a salary regularly, there should be no excuse for withholding the petitioner's fellowship.
Justice D. K. Singh remarked, "If the Vice Chancellor of the University is receiving a salary regularly, there can be no justification for non-payment of the petitioner's fellowship." This ruling was issued while the Court was reviewing a case lodged by a Ph.D. fellow at the Sankaracharya University of Kalady, who had been denied a sanctioned fellowship amount.
The University claimed it could not disburse the fellowship due to financial constraints.
However, the Court was displeased and mandated the University to settle the fellowship arrears within a month.
The Court also stated that the salaries of the Vice Chancellor and Registrar would be withheld until the petitioner's dues were cleared.
Point of View
It is essential to recognize the broader implications of this ruling. The Kerala High Court's decision to mandate the release of retirement benefits reflects a commitment to justice and accountability within the state's educational framework. It underscores the need for transparency in government actions, especially concerning the rights of retired officials. This case is a reminder of the balance between administrative authority and individual rights.
NationPress
27/07/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What did the Kerala High Court order regarding Ciza Thomas's benefits?
The Kerala High Court ordered the Vijayan government to disburse Ciza Thomas's retirement and pensionary benefits within two weeks.
Why was Ciza Thomas facing disciplinary action?
Ciza Thomas faced disciplinary action starting on the day she retired as Vice Chancellor of KTU on March 31, 2023.
What position does Ciza Thomas currently hold?
Ciza Thomas currently serves as the Vice Chancellor of the Kerala University of Digital Sciences, Innovation and Technology.
What was the conflict between the Governor and Chief Minister about?
The conflict revolved around differing opinions and directives regarding educational administration in the state.
What did the Court say about the payment of fellowships?
The Court emphasized that if the Vice Chancellor is receiving a salary, there is no justification for delaying the payment of sanctioned fellowships.
