Kerala PSC evaluation lapse: Minister demands high-level probe into 2023 exam

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Kerala PSC evaluation lapse: Minister demands high-level probe into 2023 exam

Synopsis

A routine RTI request cracked open a Kerala PSC scandal: ten descriptive answers left unevaluated across all 228 candidates in a 2023 State Planning Board exam, with the rank list already published and one appointment already made. Now Sports Minister O.J. Jenish is demanding a high-level probe — and the Left Opposition's unusual silence is raising its own questions.

Key Takeaways

The Kerala PSC failed to evaluate ten descriptive answers for all 228 candidates who appeared in the 13 July 2023 examination for senior State Planning Board posts.
The lapse was uncovered only after a candidate escalated an RTI request to the State Information Commission , which was about to order disclosure.
The KPSC published the rank list on 31 May 2025 and one candidate was appointed before the error was detected.
Sports Minister O.J.
Jenish has demanded an independent, high-level probe and plans to meet Chief Minister V.D.
The PSC has ordered an internal vigilance enquiry and will prepare a revised rank list after re-evaluating all unevaluated answers.
All 15 members of the current PSC Board were appointed by the Pinarayi Vijayan government; the CPI-M -led Left has remained silent despite an ongoing Assembly session.

A significant evaluation lapse in the Kerala Public Service Commission (KPSC) has erupted into a full-blown political controversy, casting serious doubts over the recruitment process for senior posts in the State Planning Board and prompting calls for an independent, high-level investigation. The lapse, which affected all 228 candidates who appeared for a 2023 examination, came to light only after a candidate approached the State Information Commission.

What the Lapse Involves

The controversy centres on an examination held on 13 July 2023 for three senior posts in the Kerala State Planning Board — Chief of the Industry and Infrastructure Division, Chief of the Perspective Planning Division, and Chief of the Planning Coordination Division. Each post carries a basic monthly salary of ₹1.25 lakh.

The KPSC published the rank list on 31 May 2025, and the first-ranked candidate for the Industry and Infrastructure Division was appointed swiftly thereafter. The problem surfaced when unsuccessful candidates, suspecting discrepancies in their scores, sought copies of their evaluated answer scripts. After their Right to Information (RTI) requests and subsequent appeals were rejected by the PSC, one candidate escalated the matter to the State Information Commission.

It was only when the Commission was on the verge of ordering disclosure that the PSC submitted the answer sheets — revealing that ten descriptive answers had gone unevaluated. Crucially, this omission affected all 228 candidates who appeared for the common examination across the three posts.

Political Backlash and Demand for Probe

Sports Minister O.J. Jenish, who also serves as Youth Congress president, came down sharply on the PSC on Wednesday, saying the episode had shaken the confidence of thousands of job aspirants across Kerala. He stated that the concerns of the state's youth could not be ignored and alleged that the irregularities warranted far more than an internal enquiry.

Jenish announced he would meet Chief Minister V.D. Satheesan to press for a more comprehensive probe. 'A mere internal vigilance probe will not inspire confidence,' he said, calling for an impartial investigation to establish accountability. He further alleged that the public could not be faulted for suspecting that the PSC had been subjected to political misuse over the past decade.

PSC's Response and Next Steps

The KPSC has announced an internal vigilance enquiry into the lapse and confirmed that the unevaluated answers of all 228 candidates will now be assessed before a revised rank list is prepared. The Commission also noted that, since some candidates have already approached the Kerala Administrative Tribunal, further action regarding those who have already received advice memos and appointments will be subject to the Tribunal's decision.

Political Silence and Board Composition

Notably, the CPI-M-led Left Opposition has maintained conspicuous silence on the issue, even as the Kerala Legislative Assembly session was in progress until Wednesday — a restraint observers describe as uncharacteristic of the Left's usual legislative conduct. The current PSC Board comprises 15 members, all of whom were appointed by the Pinarayi Vijayan government during its tenure in power.

With a revised rank list pending, appointments already made under scrutiny at the Tribunal, and political pressure mounting, the KPSC lapse is set to remain a flashpoint in Kerala's public employment landscape.

Point of View

But because of how it came to light — through an RTI escalation that the PSC resisted at every stage. An institution that evaluates candidates for senior planning roles should not require a quasi-judicial order to produce answer scripts. The Left Opposition's silence during an active Assembly session is the subplot that deserves equal scrutiny: if the same lapse had occurred under a rival government, the legislative response would almost certainly have been louder. With all 15 PSC members being Pinarayi Vijayan-era appointees, the demand for an independent probe rather than an internal vigilance enquiry is not merely political — it is a basic credibility requirement.
NationPress
1 Jul 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Kerala PSC evaluation lapse about?
The Kerala Public Service Commission failed to evaluate ten descriptive answers for all 228 candidates who appeared in a 13 July 2023 examination for senior State Planning Board posts. The error was discovered only after a candidate approached the State Information Commission following rejected RTI requests.
Which posts were involved in the Kerala PSC controversy?
The examination was held for three senior posts in the Kerala State Planning Board: Chief of the Industry and Infrastructure Division, Chief of the Perspective Planning Division, and Chief of the Planning Coordination Division, each carrying a basic monthly salary of ₹1.25 lakh.
What action has the Kerala PSC taken so far?
The PSC has announced an internal vigilance enquiry and confirmed that the unevaluated answers of all 228 candidates will be re-assessed before a revised rank list is prepared. Appointments already made are subject to the Kerala Administrative Tribunal's decision.
Why is Minister O.J. Jenish demanding a high-level probe?
Sports Minister O.J. Jenish, who is also Youth Congress president, argues that an internal vigilance enquiry lacks credibility and will not restore public confidence. He has alleged possible political misuse of the PSC over the past decade and plans to meet Chief Minister V.D. Satheesan to push for an independent investigation.
Why is the CPI-M's silence on the Kerala PSC lapse significant?
The CPI-M-led Left Opposition has remained unusually quiet on the issue even during an ongoing Kerala Assembly session, which observers note is uncharacteristic. Critics point out that all 15 current PSC Board members were appointed by the Pinarayi Vijayan government, raising questions about political accountability.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest Yesterday
  2. 1 month ago
  3. 2 months ago
  4. 3 months ago
  5. 4 months ago
  6. 1 year ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google