Kerala PSC exam row: Crime Branch SIT files FIR over recruitment irregularities
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
The Crime Branch Special Investigation Team (SIT) has registered a First Information Report (FIR) in connection with alleged irregularities in a Kerala Public Service Commission (PSC) recruitment examination, marking a significant escalation in one of the most politically sensitive probes in the state. The FIR was filed in Thiruvananthapuram on 29 July after the SIT, headed by Inspector General of Police Ajitha Beegum, submitted its findings to the State Police Chief.
Key Developments in the Probe
According to reports, the decision to register the FIR followed detailed consultations with legal experts. Critically, the FIR does not name any individual as an accused at this stage — but investigators have concluded that serious procedural lapses occurred, sufficient to warrant a full-fledged criminal investigation.
With the FIR now on record, the SIT is expected to expand its team and accelerate the questioning of individuals connected to the examination. Investigators are preparing a list of PSC employees who will be summoned for questioning, as the probe seeks to fix responsibility for the identified lapses.
What the Examination Was About
The recruitment examination at the centre of the controversy was conducted by the Kerala PSC for senior appointments to the Kerala State Planning Board — one of the state's key policy-making institutions. The process was meant to ensure merit-based selection. The examination, interview process, and subsequent appointment were all carried out during the tenure of the Pinarayi Vijayan-led Left Democratic Front (LDF) government.
The appointment that triggered the controversy reportedly involved a candidate alleged to have Left political leanings being placed in a top post at the Planning Board. These allegations, if substantiated, would point to a subversion of the PSC's core mandate of impartial recruitment.
Political and Constitutional Stakes
The case carries significant constitutional weight. The PSC is a constitutionally mandated body responsible for transparent, merit-based recruitment to government service. The present PSC comprises a Chairman and 15 Members, all appointed by the Vijayan government. Under the Constitution, the Chairman and Members hold office for six years or until attaining the age of 62, whichever is earlier.
It remains to be seen whether politically appointed PSC Members will come under the SIT's scanner as the investigation progresses. Critics argue that any finding of manipulation would strike at the credibility of an institution that represents the aspirations of lakhs of government job aspirants across Kerala.
Internal Inquiry Running Parallel
Notably, the PSC has also announced an internal inquiry into the controversy. However, details of its progress have not been made public, raising questions about transparency within the body itself. The parallel tracks — a criminal FIR and an internal probe — reflect the gravity with which authorities are treating the alleged lapses.
What Happens Next
The SIT is expected to widen the scope of its investigation considerably in the coming weeks. The questioning of PSC staff and potentially its Members will be a defining phase. Whether the probe leads to named accused — and whether those individuals include political appointees — will determine the full political fallout of this case for the LDF government and for Kerala's constitutional recruitment framework.