Is the Deadlock Between Kerala Governor and Government Over VC Appointments Deepening?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- Kerala Governor Rajendra Arlekar and the state government are at an impasse over Vice Chancellor appointments.
- Recent high-level talks failed to resolve the deadlock, with both sides holding firm.
- The Supreme Court may intervene if an agreement is not reached.
- The situation reflects broader issues in governance and higher education governance.
- The outcome could have significant implications for Kerala's educational institutions.
Thiruvananthapuram, Dec 10 (NationPress) The impasse between Kerala Governor Rajendra Arlekar and the Pinarayi Vijayan administration regarding the appointment of Vice Chancellors for the Technological and Digital Universities intensified on Wednesday after high-level discussions failed to reach any agreement.
Law Minister P. Rajeev and Higher Education Minister R. Bindu engaged in talks with the Governor at Lok Bhavan as part of a reconciliation attempt initiated following stern remarks from the Supreme Court.
However, the hour-long dialogue concluded without a resolution, with both parties remaining steadfast in their positions.
Governor Arlekar emphasized that the candidates he proposed were fully qualified and questioned why Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan did not participate in the discussions.
He also expressed dissatisfaction over the lack of clarity regarding how the Chief Minister prioritized his recommendations.
The conflict escalated following a recent affidavit filed by the Governor in the Supreme Court, opposing the Chief Minister’s nominees.
While the Chief Minister recommended C. Satheesh Kumar for the Kerala Technological University and Saji Gopinath for the Digital University, the Governor insisted on appointing Ciza Thomas to the Technological University and Dr. Priya Chandran to the Digital University.
The Governor expressed dissatisfaction with the Chief Minister for overlooking merit and excluding Thomas.
The Supreme Court, currently reviewing the case, has shown significant displeasure regarding the ongoing stalemate.
A bench led by Justice J.B. Pardiwala warned that if consensus is not achieved based on the lists from the two search committees chaired by Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia, the court may proceed with the Vice Chancellor appointments itself.
The state administration has insisted that appointments must strictly follow the panel submitted by the Chief Minister, while expressing a willingness for a negotiated resolution.
With the latest talks also failing, all eyes are now on the Supreme Court, whose forthcoming actions are anticipated to significantly influence the outcome of this high-profile constitutional dispute.
To ease tensions, Rajeev stated after the unsuccessful meeting with the Governor that discussions would continue.