New Delhi, March 1 (NationPress) The killing of Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, might not guarantee the regime change that both the United States and Israel have anticipated, according to diplomatic analysts. They warn that this significant event could lead to extensive repercussions for the global economy.

Khamenei's death occurred due to an attack orchestrated by the US and Israel, marking a pivotal moment in the 46-year-long Shia-theocratic governance, as Tehran's response ignited turmoil across a broad region of the Middle East.

In an interview with IANS, former High Commissioner of India to Bangladesh, Veena Sikri, characterized the situation as dire and economically destabilizing. "This is a very serious situation and a major jolt to the world economy. We have seen that even the Dubai airport has been shut, and the economy of Dubai has been affected. The Strait of Hormuz is virtually closed. This is a significant upheaval for the global economy," she stated.

Sikri pointed out that this escalation coincided with ongoing diplomatic negotiations. "This has happened at a time when Oman had brokered talks between the United States and Iran, which were being held in Geneva. Initial feedback suggested that these talks were progressing well, with Iran making several concessions. However, it now seems that these discussions were merely a facade, as Israel was intent on attacking Iran. I believe Israel initiated the strike yesterday, with the US following suit," she elaborated.

Former diplomat K.P. Fabian also spoke to IANS, labeling the operation a notable military achievement for Washington and Tel Aviv while questioning its potential to instigate political changes within Iran. "This is an important military victory for Israel and the United States, but it does not necessarily bring them closer to what they term regime change, as there is considerable ambiguity around that phrase," he noted.

Fabian further proposed that the operation was likely based on intricate intelligence. "Israel had intelligence, probably both human and electronic, allowing them to destroy the residence where the Ayatollah, his daughter, son-in-law, and granddaughter were present," he added.

Reflecting on Khamenei's lengthy rule, former diplomat Mahesh Kumar Sachdev told IANS that the Iranian leader maintained a pragmatic yet ideologically steadfast approach throughout his years in power. "For 36 years, Khamenei adhered to a strategy of realism and theocratic dominance, balancing various factions," he said. "He endeavored to unify the country and its Islamic revolution while diversifying its options through negotiations, promoting proxies, and skillfully navigating the dynamics between clergy, political elites, economic interests, and the judiciary. Although some observers labeled him ruthless and unprincipled, he was quite effective in his endeavors," Sachdev concluded.