Will K'taka HC Approve Padayatra Requests from RSS and Others on November 2?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The upcoming hearing at Kalaburagi High Court could set a precedent for the RSS and other organizations seeking to hold a padayatra in Chittapur on November 2. With political tensions rising, this case highlights the ongoing conflict between state authorities and civic organizations. Will the court side with the RSS or the government?
Key Takeaways
- High Court in Kalaburagi is reviewing multiple petitions.
- RSS and others are seeking to hold a padayatra on November 2.
- Political tensions are escalating in Karnataka.
- Authorities previously denied permission citing law and order concerns.
- The outcome may influence future public assembly rights.
Kalaburagi (Karnataka), Oct 24 (NationPress) The High Court Bench in Kalaburagi is set to examine petitions from the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) along with five other groups who are requesting permission to organize a padayatra on November 2 in Chittapur, a town represented by Minister Priyank Kharge for RDPR, IT, and BT.
Previously, the RSS had contested the refusal of permission from local authorities to proceed with their centenary padayatra in Chittapur. In response, the court instructed the RSS to file a new application to secure authorization for their events on November 2. Following this, organizations such as the Bhim Army, Dalit Panthers, and various Kuruba community groups submitted their own requests to hold marches and processions on the same date.
Additionally, the Karnataka State Farmers’ Association has petitioned for permission to conduct a procession advocating for flood relief from the central government. The State Christian Welfare Society has also sought approval for a peace walk, explaining that their event, which coincides with Sunday prayers, aims to foster peace awareness rather than oppose the RSS march.
The High Court will address these petitions later today.
These organizations have also approached the Deputy Commissioner of Kalaburagi, Fouzia Taranum, who is consulting with the police regarding the requests.
Initially, the RSS planned to hold a foot march on October 19, but was denied permission due to concerns over law and order. The RSS asserted that they had complied with all necessary protocols and subsequently sought the High Court's intervention.
This situation is expected to generate significant debate, with the court’s decision being closely monitored.
In response to a letter from Minister Priyank Kharge urging a ban on RSS activities in public areas, the Congress-led state government enacted legislation mandating that all private organizations secure prior approval from authorities for any public or government property events.
The BJP countered allegations made by the Congress government in Karnataka regarding attempts to suppress the RSS, asserting that the Sangh possesses the capability to face off against "hundreds of Priyank Kharges and Siddaramaiahs."
Point of View
It is essential to recognize the delicate balance between public order and the right to assemble. The situation surrounding the RSS and other organizations in Karnataka illustrates the complexities of governance and civil liberties. Ensuring that all voices are heard while maintaining law and order is crucial for a thriving democracy.
NationPress
24/10/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the padayatra organized by RSS?
The padayatra organized by RSS is a foot march intended to commemorate their centenary and promote their ideological goals.
Why was the RSS denied permission for their march?
The authorities denied permission for the RSS's march due to concerns regarding law and order.
What other organizations have filed petitions?
Other organizations include the Bhim Army, Dalit Panthers, and Kuruba community groups, all seeking to hold events on the same day.
What is the significance of the High Court's decision?
The High Court's decision will not only affect the planned padayatra but also set a precedent for future public assembly rights in Karnataka.
How has the government responded to the RSS's activities?
The government has enacted a law requiring private organizations to obtain prior permission for public activities, especially in response to RSS's requests.
