Kumaraswamy slams Karnataka govt over Cauvery water dispute mismanagement

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Kumaraswamy slams Karnataka govt over Cauvery water dispute mismanagement

Synopsis

Union Minister Kumaraswamy didn't just criticise the Karnataka government — he methodically dismantled its Cauvery strategy, alleging that senior advocate Mohan Katarki was denied a chair at a key meeting and that Tamil Nadu had been working the legal corridors since May while Karnataka slept. With CWMA and CWRC ordering a 12,000-cusecs daily release for 15 days, the political heat and water pressure are rising simultaneously.

Key Takeaways

Kumaraswamy held an emergency press conference in New Delhi on 12 August , accusing the Karnataka government of mishandling the Cauvery water dispute .
Senior advocate Mohan Katarki allegedly walked out of a Karnataka MPs' meeting at Karnataka Bhavan after not being provided a chair.
Both the CWMA and CWRC have recommended Karnataka release 12,000 cusecs of water daily to Tamil Nadu for 15 days .
Kumaraswamy alleged Tamil Nadu moved before Cauvery authorities as early as May , while Karnataka was unprepared until June .
The Supreme Court has not yet issued a final order on a distress-sharing formula , which Kumaraswamy says Karnataka should have pushed for proactively.
Shivakumar served as Water Resources Minister for three years before becoming CM, a record Kumaraswamy questioned publicly.

Union Minister for Heavy Industries and Steel H.D. Kumaraswamy on Wednesday, 12 August launched a sharp attack on the Karnataka government, alleging that it had grossly mishandled the Cauvery water dispute and systematically sidelined the state's own legal experts. Speaking at an emergency press conference in New Delhi, Kumaraswamy accused Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar and his administration of failing to mount an adequate legal and administrative defence of Karnataka's water interests.

Legal Experts Sidelined, Allege Critics

Kumaraswamy alleged that senior lawyers representing Karnataka before the Supreme Court and various Cauvery authorities were not being accorded due respect by the state government. He specifically referred to claims that senior advocate Mohan Katarki was not provided a chair during a meeting of Karnataka MPs convened by Chief Minister Shivakumar at Karnataka Bhavan in New Delhi, and subsequently walked out of the meeting.

Kumaraswamy further alleged that legal experts were given inadequate importance at an all-party meeting held at the Krishna office in Bengaluru. 'When such meetings are convened, the legal and technical aspects should be placed before the participants. The Chief Minister should have sought the views of the legal experts at the beginning of the meeting. Ignoring legal experts in this manner shows a lack of foresight and preparation,' he said.

CWMA and CWRC Order Water Release

The minister pointed out that both the Cauvery Water Management Authority (CWMA) and the Cauvery Water Regulation Committee (CWRC) had recommended that Karnataka release 12,000 cusecs of water daily to Tamil Nadu for 15 days. He alleged that Tamil Nadu had strategically moved before the Cauvery authorities as early as May, while Karnataka was expected to begin releasing water only from June — a lag he described as a critical failure of preparation.

Kumaraswamy also questioned the state's claim of transparency in deciding water releases. 'Does transparency mean releasing water to Tamil Nadu? If water is released because there has been rainfall and inflows into the reservoirs have increased, what will happen in the coming days?' he asked.

Farmers Bear the Cost, Says Kumaraswamy

Kumaraswamy alleged that instead of strengthening Karnataka's legal position, Chief Minister Shivakumar had advised farmers in the Cauvery and Krishna basin regions against taking up water-intensive crops. 'The loss was suffered by our farmers. Even crops that had already been cultivated were lost due to lack of water,' he said.

He also flagged the absence of a Supreme Court-approved distress-sharing formula, alleging that Karnataka had failed to press for one before the Cauvery authorities. 'No final order has so far been issued by the Supreme Court on a distress formula,' he noted, arguing the state should have been more proactive.

Political Blame and What Comes Next

Kumaraswamy took a pointed political jab at Shivakumar, noting that the Chief Minister had served as Water Resources Minister for three years before assuming the top post. 'What was he doing during that period?' he questioned. He also alleged that the Congress-led government was prioritising Cabinet expansion and internal party matters — including meetings with senior Congress leaders Mallikarjun Kharge, K.C. Venugopal, and Randeep Singh Surjewala — over Karnataka's water interests.

The minister urged the Karnataka government to anticipate Tamil Nadu's next legal and administrative moves rather than reacting after a crisis emerges. 'Do not wait for a crisis to prepare. Take the necessary precautionary measures and do not repeat the mistakes made so far,' he said. MP M. Mallesh Babu, MLA Samruddhi Manjunath, and senior Janata Dal (Secular) leader B.D. Patil from Vijayapura district were present at the press conference. With the dispute still unresolved before the Supreme Court, the coming weeks are expected to see intensified legal activity from both states.

Point of View

Particularly around advocate Mohan Katarki's treatment, are difficult for the Congress government to dismiss without a detailed rebuttal. The deeper problem is structural: Karnataka has historically been reactive on Cauvery, allowing Tamil Nadu to set the agenda before Cauvery authorities. The absence of a Supreme Court-endorsed distress formula after decades of litigation is a genuine governance failure that predates Shivakumar, even if the current administration now owns it. The farmers caught between political posturing and water scarcity are the ones with the least recourse.
NationPress
12 Aug 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What did Kumaraswamy allege about Karnataka's handling of the Cauvery water dispute?
Kumaraswamy alleged that the Karnataka government failed to make adequate preparations to protect the state's interests, sidelined senior legal experts including advocate Mohan Katarki, and allowed Tamil Nadu to gain the upper hand before the Cauvery Water Management Authority and Cauvery Water Regulation Committee. He made these allegations at an emergency press conference in New Delhi on 12 August.
What is the CWMA and CWRC order on Cauvery water release?
Both the Cauvery Water Management Authority (CWMA) and the Cauvery Water Regulation Committee (CWRC) have recommended that Karnataka release 12,000 cusecs of water daily to Tamil Nadu for 15 days. Kumaraswamy cited this order as evidence of Karnataka's failure to mount a strong legal defence.
Who is Mohan Katarki and why is he at the centre of the controversy?
Mohan Katarki is a senior advocate representing Karnataka before the Supreme Court and Cauvery authorities. Kumaraswamy alleged that Katarki was not provided a chair at a meeting of Karnataka MPs convened by Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar at Karnataka Bhavan in New Delhi, and consequently left the meeting — a claim the minister cited as emblematic of the government's disregard for legal expertise.
What is the Cauvery distress-sharing formula and why does it matter?
A distress-sharing formula would legally define how Karnataka and Tamil Nadu divide Cauvery water during years of deficient rainfall. Kumaraswamy alleged that no final Supreme Court order on such a formula exists, and that Karnataka should have proactively pressed for one before the Cauvery authorities to protect farmers in the Cauvery and Krishna basin regions.
How has the Cauvery water dispute affected Karnataka farmers?
Kumaraswamy alleged that Karnataka farmers in the Cauvery and Krishna basin regions suffered crop losses due to water scarcity, and that Chief Minister Shivakumar had advised farmers against water-intensive crops rather than strengthening the state's legal position. 'The loss was suffered by our farmers. Even crops that had already been cultivated were lost due to lack of water,' he said.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 week ago
  2. 1 week ago
  3. 1 week ago
  4. 1 week ago
  5. 1 week ago
  6. 1 week ago
  7. 1 week ago
  8. 1 week ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google