Kumaraswamy accuses Shivakumar of plotting to grab Bidadi farmers' land

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Kumaraswamy accuses Shivakumar of plotting to grab Bidadi farmers' land

Synopsis

Union Minister H.D. Kumaraswamy has drawn a pointed line from a 2023 temple speech by D.K. Shivakumar to a 2026 GBDA notification covering 7,481 acres in Ramanagara — alleging the Karnataka CM has systematically manoeuvred for years to convert fertile farmland near Bidadi into a real estate windfall, with farmers being offered ₹2 crore for land the government values at ₹12 crore nearby.

Key Takeaways

Kumaraswamy accused Karnataka CM D.K.
Shivakumar of plotting to acquire fertile farmland in Bidadi at a public meeting in Byramangala on 27 June .
The GBDA issued a preliminary land acquisition notification on 12 March 2025 covering approximately 7,481 acres across nine villages in Ramanagara and Harohalli taluks.
Farmers in affected areas are reportedly being offered around ₹2 crore in compensation, while nearby government land near Eagleton is valued at ₹12 crore .
Kumaraswamy linked the acquisition to the 22 May 2025 Cabinet decision renaming Ramanagara as Bengaluru South and the 18 January 2024 Cabinet approval of the GBDA .
Kumaraswamy pledged to support farmers legally at no cost and refused to discuss the matter at Vidhana Soudha , insisting any debate must happen before affected farmers.

Union Minister for Heavy Industries and Steel H.D. Kumaraswamy on Saturday, 27 June levelled serious allegations against Karnataka Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar, accusing him of systematically pursuing a long-term plan to acquire fertile agricultural land from farmers in Bidadi, near Bengaluru. Kumaraswamy made these charges while addressing aggrieved farmers at Byramangala, after Shivakumar declined an invitation to participate in an open discussion at the same venue.

The Core Allegations

Kumaraswamy alleged that Shivakumar's interest in the lands around Bidadi was not a recent development. He claimed the Chief Minister had for years harboured plans to bring these agricultural holdings under real estate development, allegedly encouraging farmers with the prospect of commanding exorbitant prices once their land fell within the orbit of Bengaluru.

The Union Minister cited remarks he attributed to Shivakumar on 24 October 2023, during a temple event at Sathanur in Kanakapura constituency on the occasion of Vijayadashami. According to Kumaraswamy, the Chief Minister had at that event urged farmers in Kanakapura not to sell their land even if offered double the prevailing price, saying they would eventually become residents of 'Bengaluru district' and their holdings would fetch far higher returns in the future.

A Chain of Administrative Decisions

Kumaraswamy drew a line connecting several official decisions he said pointed to a coordinated plan. He noted that on 22 May 2025, the State Cabinet — then chaired by Chief Minister Siddaramaiah — approved the renaming of Ramanagara district as Bengaluru South, with the Revenue Department issuing a Gazette notification the very next day.

He further stated that on 18 January 2024, acting on a proposal moved by then Deputy Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar, the State Cabinet approved amendments to the Bengaluru Metropolitan Region Development Authority Act, enabling the establishment of the Greater Bengaluru Development Authority (GBDA). A final Gazette notification constituting the GBDA was issued on 11 June 2026.

On 12 March 2025, he said, the GBDA issued its first official preliminary notification to initiate land acquisition proceedings covering approximately 7,481 acres across nine villages in Ramanagara and Harohalli taluks. Kumaraswamy alleged these steps were taken in a phased manner and amounted to a systematic misuse of authority to deprive farmers of their lands.

Bidadi Township and the Congress Government

Responding to allegations that the Bidadi township project was originally his own vision, Kumaraswamy maintained that he had formally withdrawn the proposal from the Assembly floor after local residents opposed it. He alleged that the same township plan he shelved in deference to public sentiment was now being revived by the Congress government under Shivakumar.

He also criticised the state's civic priorities, alleging that despite spending ₹1,200 crore on pothole repairs, the government had failed to address basic urban infrastructure issues and was now seeking to rename Ramanagara as Bengaluru South to facilitate further land acquisitions.

Compensation Concerns and Farmer Support

Kumaraswamy alleged a stark disparity in land valuations, claiming that while government land near Eagleton had been valued at ₹12 crore, farmers in the affected areas were being offered only around ₹2 crore in compensation. He assured farmers they need not spend a single rupee on legal battles and pledged to stand firmly by them.

In one of his sharpest remarks directed at the Chief Minister, Kumaraswamy declared that those who threatened to send him to jail would have to 'be born a hundred times over' to accomplish that. He declined Shivakumar's invitation to discuss the matter at Vidhana Soudha, insisting any dialogue must take place directly before the affected farmers. With the GBDA's land acquisition process already initiated, the standoff between the Union Minister and the Chief Minister is set to intensify in the weeks ahead.

Point of View

But the administrative timeline he presents — a 2023 speech, a 2024 GBDA amendment, a 2025 district renaming, and a 2026 acquisition notification — is factually verifiable and deserves independent scrutiny. The ₹2 crore versus ₹12 crore compensation gap, if accurate, is the sharpest accountability question in this story and one that mainstream coverage has underplayed. The deeper issue is structural: the GBDA's jurisdiction expansion effectively brings peri-urban agricultural land into a development orbit without the safeguards that a standalone land acquisition law might provide. Whether this is a coordinated design or sequential policy decisions will be tested in court — and Kumaraswamy's pledge of free legal support to farmers means that test is coming sooner rather than later.
NationPress
27 Jun 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Bidadi land acquisition controversy about?
Union Minister H.D. Kumaraswamy has alleged that Karnataka Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar has been systematically pursuing plans to acquire approximately 7,481 acres of fertile agricultural land across nine villages in Ramanagara and Harohalli taluks near Bidadi. He claims a chain of administrative decisions from 2023 to 2026 — including the GBDA's formation and Ramanagara's renaming — were steps in a coordinated plan to facilitate real estate development on farmland.
What is the Greater Bengaluru Development Authority and when was it formed?
The Greater Bengaluru Development Authority (GBDA) was established through amendments to the Bengaluru Metropolitan Region Development Authority Act, approved by the State Cabinet on 18 January 2024 on a proposal moved by then Deputy Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar. The final Gazette notification constituting the GBDA was issued on 11 June 2026.
How much compensation are Bidadi farmers being offered?
According to Kumaraswamy, farmers in the affected areas are being offered around ₹2 crore in compensation, while government land near Eagleton in the same region has reportedly been valued at ₹12 crore. He has pledged that farmers will not need to spend any money on legal challenges.
Why did Kumaraswamy refuse to meet Shivakumar at Vidhana Soudha?
Kumaraswamy declined the Chief Minister's invitation to discuss the land acquisition issue at Vidhana Soudha, insisting that any dialogue must take place directly before the affected farmers. He had earlier written to Shivakumar requesting an open discussion at Byramangala, which the Chief Minister did not attend.
What is Kumaraswamy's position on the Bidadi township project?
Kumaraswamy maintains he originally proposed the Bidadi township project but formally withdrew it from the Assembly floor after local residents opposed it. He alleges the same township proposal has now been revived by the Congress government under Chief Minister Shivakumar, despite previously being shelved in deference to public sentiment.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest Yesterday
  2. 2 days ago
  3. 5 days ago
  4. 1 week ago
  5. 2 weeks ago
  6. 1 month ago
  7. 1 month ago
  8. 9 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google