Lucknow fire: Engaged couple among 15 killed in commercial building blaze

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Lucknow fire: Engaged couple among 15 killed in commercial building blaze

Synopsis

A couple days away from finalising their wedding plans, Nilesh Kumar and Anamika Samant died in the same building where they had first met as colleagues. Their story is the human face of a Lucknow fire that killed 15 — and exposed a building allegedly flagged as illegal a decade ago, still operating, with fire tenders reportedly arriving nearly an hour too late.

Key Takeaways

A fire at a commercial building in Lucknow on 23 June killed 15 people .
Among the dead were engaged couple Nilesh Kumar ( 29 ) and Anamika Samant , both 3D designers who worked in the building.
Anamika's cousin Somilya , employed at a coaching centre in the same building, also died in the fire.
Family members allege the fire brigade arrived 40 minutes to one hour late, worsening the death toll.
Abhishek Kumar , Nilesh's brother, alleged the building had been declared illegal 10 years ago with no action taken.
Investigations are underway; no arrests or accountability measures had been announced at the time of reporting.

A devastating fire that tore through a commercial building in Lucknow on Monday, 23 June claimed the lives of 15 people, including Nilesh Kumar, a 29-year-old 3D designer, and his fiancée Anamika Samant — a couple whose families had only recently begun planning their wedding. The blaze has left behind shattered families, unanswered questions about building safety, and allegations of a critically delayed emergency response.

A Love Story Cut Short

Nilesh and Anamika had first met as colleagues at the animation centre housed within the same building. Their professional association grew into a close friendship and eventually a relationship, with both families extending their approval and beginning to discuss wedding arrangements. In a heartbreaking coincidence, Anamika's parents had travelled from West Bengal to Lucknow just days before the fire to meet Nilesh's family and discuss the upcoming marriage — a joyful visit that turned into an unimaginable tragedy.

Adding to the family's grief, Anamika's cousin Somilya, who was employed at a coaching centre operating within the building, also perished in the fire.

Family Allegations of Delayed Response

Nilesh's brother, Abhishek Kumar, recounted how the family first learned of the incident through a call from KGMU, only to be summoned shortly after to identify the body. He was scathing about the role of local authorities, alleging that the building had been flagged as illegal a decade ago without any consequential action being taken.

'I think that the administration is responsible for this. If the building was declared illegal 10 years ago, then why was no action taken against it? Who will take the action? The administration should answer. I don't think that there will be any action against anyone, just like it wasn't done in the last 10 years,' Abhishek said.

Nilesh's mother, inconsolable in her grief, alleged that emergency services took nearly an hour to reach the site — a delay she believes cost her son his life. 'There were no proper facilities.... Even 10-15 minutes are enough in such a situation because the fire spreads very quickly. But we came to know that no one had reached there for nearly an hour. By then, everything had happened, and my child lost his life,' she said.

Nilesh's younger sister echoed those allegations, directly holding the fire department accountable. 'The fire brigade arrived very late, after around 40 minutes to one hour. This delay caused the loss of many lives,' she said.

Safety Lapses Under Scrutiny

The allegations raised by the victims' families point to a broader pattern of regulatory failure — a commercial building reportedly flagged as illegal years ago, continuing to operate as a hub for coaching centres and animation studios with no enforcement action. Critics argue that this incident is not an isolated tragedy but a systemic failure of building safety oversight and emergency preparedness in urban Uttar Pradesh.

This comes amid recurring concerns across Indian cities about unauthorised commercial structures operating without adequate fire safety compliance, particularly in densely built educational and commercial zones.

Investigation Underway

Authorities have confirmed that investigations into the cause and circumstances of the fire are ongoing. As of the time of reporting, no arrests or formal accountability measures had been announced. Family members expressed deep scepticism that those responsible would face consequences, citing what they described as a decade of inaction on the building's illegal status.

With 15 lives lost and multiple families devastated, pressure is mounting on the Uttar Pradesh government and Lucknow municipal authorities to provide answers — and to ensure that the systemic gaps exposed by this tragedy are urgently addressed.

Point of View

Apparently unchallenged by municipal enforcement. The family's allegation that fire tenders took up to an hour to arrive — if verified — would represent a catastrophic emergency response failure in a city of Lucknow's scale. What makes this pattern dangerous is its predictability: India has seen this sequence before, in Surat, in Delhi, in Rajkot — illegal structures, absent inspections, delayed response, mass casualties, and investigations that rarely produce accountability. Without structural reform in building safety enforcement and fire service response benchmarks, the next such tragedy is a matter of when, not if.
NationPress
23 Jun 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened in the Lucknow commercial building fire on 23 June?
A fire engulfed a commercial building in Lucknow on Monday, 23 June, killing at least 15 people. The building housed a coaching centre and an animation studio, among other businesses. Investigations into the cause are ongoing.
Who were Nilesh Kumar and Anamika Samant?
Nilesh Kumar, 29, and Anamika Samant were an engaged couple who both worked as 3D designers at the animation centre in the building. They had met as colleagues and their families had recently begun planning their wedding. Both died in the fire.
Why are families alleging the fire response was delayed?
Family members of the victims claim that fire brigade personnel took approximately 40 minutes to one hour to reach the scene. Nilesh's mother alleged that no one had arrived for nearly an hour, by which time the fire had caused irreversible damage. These are the families' allegations; official response timings have not been independently confirmed.
Was the building operating illegally?
According to Nilesh's brother Abhishek Kumar, the building had reportedly been declared illegal approximately 10 years before the fire, but no action was taken by authorities. This allegation has not been officially confirmed, and investigations are underway.
What action has been taken after the Lucknow fire?
Authorities have confirmed that investigations into the fire are ongoing. As of the time of reporting, no arrests or formal accountability measures had been announced. Family members expressed doubt that those responsible would face consequences.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 2 hours ago
  2. 2 hours ago
  3. 6 hours ago
  4. 7 hours ago
  5. 8 hours ago
  6. 19 hours ago
  7. 19 hours ago
  8. 22 hours ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google